# A note on *l*^{
p
}norms of weighted mean matrices

- Peng Gao
^{1}Email author

**2012**:110

https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-110

© Gao; licensee Springer. 2012

**Received: **11 January 2012

**Accepted: **19 May 2012

**Published: **19 May 2012

## Abstract

We present some results concerning the *l*^{
p
}norms of weighted mean matrices. These results can be regarded as analogues to a result of Bennett concerning weighted Carleman's inequalities.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 47A30.

## Keywords

## 1. Introduction

*p*≥ 1, let

*l*

^{ p }be the Banach space of all complex sequences a = (

*a*

_{ n })

_{n ≥ 1}with norm

*p*> 1,

*C*= (

*c*

_{n,k}) and the parameter

*p*> 1 are assumed fixed, and the estimate is to hold for all complex sequences a ∈

*l*

^{ p }. The

*l*

^{ p }operator norm of

*C*is then defined as

It follows that inequality (1.2) holds for any a ∈ *l*^{
p
}when *U*^{1/p}≥ ||*C*||_{p,p}and fails to hold for some a ∈ *l*^{
p
}when *U*^{1/p}< ||*C*||_{p,p}. Hardy's inequality thus asserts that the Cesáro matrix operator *C*, given by *c*_{n,k}= 1/*n*, *k* ≤ *n* and 0 otherwise, is bounded on *l*^{
p
}and has norm ≤ *p*/(*p* - 1). (The norm is in fact *p*/(*p* - 1).)

*A*= (

*a*

_{n,k}) is a lower triangular matrix if

*a*

_{n,k}= 0 for

*n*<

*k*and a lower triangular matrix

*A*is a summability matrix if

*a*

_{n,k}≥ 0 and ${\sum}_{k=1}^{n}{a}_{n,k}=1$. We say a summability matrix

*A*is a weighted mean matrix if its entries satisfy:

Hardy's inequality (1.1) now motivates one to determine the *l*^{
p
}operator norm of an arbitrary summability or weighted mean matrix *A*. Gao [2] proved the following result:

**Theorem 1.1**.

*Let*1 <

*p*< ∞

*be fixed. Let A be a weighted mean matrix given by*(1.3).

*If for any integer n*≥ 1,

*there exists a positive constant*0 <

*L*<

*p such that*

*then* ||*A*||_{p,p}≤ *p*/(*p*-*L*).

It is easy to see that the above result implies the following well-known result of Cartlidge [3] (see also [4], p. 416, Theorem C]):

**Theorem 1.2**.

*Let*1 <

*p*< ∞

*be fixed. Let A be a weighted mean matrix given by*(1.3).

*If*

*then* ||*A*||_{p,p}≤ *p*/(*p*-*L*).

The above result of Cartlidge are very handy to use when determining *l*^{
p
}norms of certain weighted mean matrices. We refer the readers to the articles [2, 5–7] for more recent developments in this area.

*p*→ +∞, one obtains the following well-known Carleman's inequality [8], which asserts that for convergent infinite series ∑

*a*

_{ n }with non-negative terms, one has

with the constant *e* being best possible.

*E*so that inequality (1.6) holds for any convergent infinite series ∑

*a*

_{ n }with non-negative terms. Note that Cartlidge's result (Theorem 1.2) implies that when (1.5) is satisfied, then for any a ∈

*l*

^{ p }, one has

Similar to our discussions above, by a change of variables ${a}_{k}\to {a}_{k}^{1/p}$ in (1.7) and on letting *p* → +∞, one obtains inequality (1.6) with *E* = *e*^{
L
}as long as (1.5) is satisfied with *p* replaced by +∞ there.

Note that (1.5) can be regarded as the case *p* → 1^{+} of (1.4) while the case *p* → +∞ of (1.4) suggests the following result:

**Corollary 1.1**.

*Suppose that*

*then inequality* (1.6) *holds with E* = *e*^{
M
}.

In fact, the above corollary is a consequence of the following nice result of Bennett (see the proof of [5, Theorem 13]):

**Theorem 1.3**.

*Inequality*(1.6)

*holds with*

It is shown in the proof of Theorem 13 in [5] that Corollary 1.1 follows from the above theorem. It is also easy to see that *M* ≤ *L* for *L* defined by (1.5) so that Corollary 1.1 provides a better result than what one can infer from Cartlidge's result as discussed above.

Note that the bound given in Theorem 1.3 is global in the sense that it involves all the λ_{
n
}'s and it implies the local version Corollary 1.1, in which only the terms Λ_{
n
}/λ_{
n
}and Λ_{n+1}/*λ*_{n+1}are involved. It is then natural to ask whether one can obtain a similar result for the *l*^{
p
}norms for *p* > 1 so that it implies the local version Theorem 1.1. It is our goal in this note to present one such result and as our result is motivated by the result of Bennett, we will first study the limiting case *p* → +∞, namely weighted Carleman's inequalities in the next section before we move on to the *l*^{
p
}cases in Section 3.

## 2. A discussion on weighted Carleman's inequalities

*N*≥ 1 here. Our starting point is the following result of Pečarić and Stolarsky [[9], (2.4)], which is an outgrowth of Redheffer's approach in [10]:

*b*is any positive sequence and

*b*

_{ n }↦ λ

_{n+1}

*b*

_{ n }/λ

_{ n }allows us to recast the above inequality as

*b*

_{ n }= (Λ

_{n+1}/λ

_{n+1})/(Λ

_{ n }/λ

_{ n }) such that Λ

_{ n }(

*b*

_{ n }/λ

_{ n }- 1/λ

_{n+1}) = 1, then one gets immediately the following:

from which the assertion of Theorem 1.3 can be readily deduced.

*b*

_{ n }'s is to set ${\prod}_{k=1}^{n}{b}_{k}^{-{\Lambda}_{k}/{\Lambda}_{n}}={e}^{-M}$. From this we see that ${b}_{n}={e}^{M{\lambda}_{n}/{\Lambda}_{n}}$ and substituting these values for

*b*

_{ n }'s we obtain via (2.2):

One checks easily that the above inequality implies Corollary 1.1.

*b*

_{ n }'s by setting ${b}_{n}={e}^{\left({\Lambda}_{n+1}/{\lambda}_{n+1}-{\Lambda}_{n}/{\lambda}_{n}\right)/\left({\Lambda}_{n}/{\lambda}_{n}\right)}$ and it follows from this and (2.2) that

from which we deduce the following

**Corollary 2.1**.

*Suppose that*

*then inequality* (1.6) *holds with E* = *e*^{
M
}.

We point out here that the above corollary also provides a better result than what one can infer from Cartlidge's result and it also follows from Theorem 1.3.

*b*

_{ n }'s will be to choose them to satisfy

*b*

_{ n }'s from the above equations. But we can solve

*b*

_{1}to get

*b*

_{1}=

*e*

^{ L }λ

_{1}/((

*e*

^{ L }- 1)λ

_{2}) and if we set

*b*

_{ n }= (Λ

_{n+1}/λ

_{n+1})/(Λ

_{ n }/λ

_{ n }) for

*n*≥ 2, we can then deduce from (2.2) that

_{2}/Λ

_{2}>

*e*

^{-L}. Similarly, one obtains

## 3. The *l*^{
p
}cases

*l*

^{ p }cases. Again it suffices to consider the cases of (1.7) with the infinite summations replaced by any finite summations, say from 1 to

*N*≥ 1 here. We may also assume that

*a*

_{ n }≥ 0 for all

*n*. With the discussions of the previous section in mind, here we seek for an

*l*

^{ p }version of (2.2). Fortunately, this is available by noting that it follows from inequality (4.3) of [7] that

*w*

_{ n }'s are positive parameters and

*w*

_{ n }/

*w*

_{n+1}↦

*b*

_{ n }, we can further recast the above inequality as

Note that if one makes a change of variables ${a}_{n}^{p}\mapsto {a}_{n}$, then inequality (2.2) follows from the above inequality upon letting *p* → +∞.

*b*

_{ n }= (1-

*L*λ

_{ n }/(

*p*Λ

_{ n }))

^{-(p-1)}in (3.2) (see [2]). It is easy to see that this gives back inequality (2.3) upon letting

*p*→ +∞ by a change of variables ${a}_{n}^{p}\mapsto {a}_{n}$ and setting

*L = M*. We note here that the

*b*

_{ n }'s are so chosen so that the following relations are satisfied:

*l*

^{ p }analogues of Theorem 1.3, we just need to note that in the

*p*→ +∞ case, one obtains Corollary 1.1 by setting ${\prod}_{k=1}^{n}{b}_{k}^{-{\Lambda}_{k}/{\Lambda}_{n}}={e}^{-M}$ and the conclusion of Corollary 1.1 follows by requiring that Λ

_{ n }(

*b*

_{ n }/λ

_{ n }- 1/λ

_{n+1}) ≥ 1 for the so chosen

*b*

_{ n }'s. If one instead chooses the

*b*

_{ n }'s so that the conditions Λ

_{ n }(

*b*

_{ n }/λ

_{ n }- 1/λ

_{n+1}) = 1 are satisfied, then Theorem 1.3 will follow. Now, in the

*l*

^{ p }cases, the choice of the

*b*

_{ n }'s so that the conditions (3.3) are satisfied implies Theorem 1.1 as (1.4) implies that for the so chosen

*b*

_{ n }'s,

*l*

^{ p }cases, we are then motivated to take the

*b*

_{ n }'s so that the following conditions are satisfied:

We then easily deduce the following *l*^{
p
}analogue of Theorem 1.3:

**Theorem 3.1**.

*Let*1 <

*p*< ∞

*be fixed. Let A be a weighted mean matrix given by*(1.3).

*If for any integer n*≥ 1,

*there exists a positive constant*0 <

*L*<

*p such that*

*then* ||*A*||_{p,p}≤ *p*/(*p*-*L*).

*b*

_{ n }'s so that the following relations are satisfied:

In general it is difficult to determine the *b*_{
n
}'s this way but one can certainly solve for *b*_{1} and by choosing other *b*_{
n
}'s so that (3.4) are satisfied, one can obtain a slightly better result than Theorem 3.1, we shall leave the details to the reader.

*b*

_{ n }'s satisfying (3.4) corresponds to the following choice for the

*a*

_{ n }'s in Section 4 of [2] (these

*a*

_{ n }'s are not to be confused with the

*a*

_{ n }'s used in the rest of the article):

_{ n }=

*L*= 1, on choosing

*b*

_{ n }'s to satisfy (3.4), we obtain via (3.2) that

This gives an improvement of Hardy's inequality (1.1).

## Declarations

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Pólya G:
*Inequalities*. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1952.Google Scholar - Gao P: On
*l*^{ p }norms of weighted mean matrices.*Math Z*2010, 264: 829–848. 10.1007/s00209-009-0490-2MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Cartlidge JM:
*Weighted mean matrices as operators on**l*^{ p }*.*Indiana University; 1978.Google Scholar - Bennett G: Some elementary inequalities.
*Q J Math Oxford Ser*1987, 38(2):401–425.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bennett G: Sums of powers and the meaning of
*l*^{ p }.*Houston J Math*2006, 32: 801–831.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Gao P: A note on Hardy-type inequalities.
*Proc Am Math Soc*2005, 133: 1977–1984. 10.1090/S0002-9939-05-07964-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Gao P: Hardy-type inequalities via auxiliary sequences.
*J Math Anal Appl*2008, 343: 48–57. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.01.024MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Carleman T: Sur les fonctions quasi-analytiques. In
*Proc 5th Scand Math Congress*. Helsingfors, Finland; 1923:181–196.Google Scholar - Pečarić J, Stolarsky K: Carleman's inequality: history and new generalizations.
*Aequationes Math*2001, 61: 49–62. 10.1007/s000100050160MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Redheffer RM: Recurrent inequalities.
*Proc Lond Math Soc*1967, 17(3):683–699.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.