Open Access

Sharp bounds for Seiffert mean in terms of root mean square

Journal of Inequalities and Applications20122012:11

https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-11

Received: 19 September 2011

Accepted: 17 January 2012

Published: 17 January 2012

Abstract

We find the greatest value α and least value β in (1/ 2,1) such that the double inequality

S ( α a + ( 1 - α ) b , α b + ( 1 - α ) a ) < T ( a , b ) < S ( β a + ( 1 - β ) b , β b + ( 1 - β ) a )

holds for all a,b > 0 with ab. Here, T(a, b) = (a-b)/[2 arctan((a-b)/(a + b))] and S(a, b) = [(a2 + b2)/2]1/ 2are the Seiffert mean and root mean square of a and b, respectively.

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 26E60.

Keywords

Seiffert mean root mean square power mean inequality

1 Introduction

For a,b > 0 with ab the Seiffert mean T(a, b) and root mean square S(a, b) are defined by
T ( a , b ) = a - b 2 arctan a - b a + b
(1.1)
and
S ( a , b ) = a 2 + b 2 2 ,
(1.2)

respectively. Recently, both mean values have been the subject of intensive research. In particular, many remarkable inequalities and properties for T and S can be found in the literature [114].

Let A ( a , b ) = ( a + b ) / 2 , G ( a , b ) = a b , and M p (a, b) = ((a p +bp)/2)1/p(p ≠ 0) and M 0 ( a , b ) = a b be the arithmetic, geometric, and p th power means of two positive numbers a and b, respectively. Then it is well known that
G ( a , b ) = M 0 ( a , b ) < A ( a , b ) = M 1 ( a , b ) < T ( a , b ) < S ( a , b ) = M 2 ( a , b )

for all a, b > 0 with ab.

Seiffert [1] proved that inequalities
A ( a , b ) < T ( a , b ) < S ( a , b )

hold for all a, b > 0 with ab.

Chu et al. [5] found the greatest value p1 and least value p2 such that the double inequality Hp 1(a,b) < T(a,b) < Hp 2(a,b) holds for all a,b > 0 with ab, where H p (a, b) = ((a p + (ab)p/2+b p )/3)1/p(p ≠ 0) and H 0 ( a , b ) = a b is the p th power-type Heron mean of a and b.

In [6], Wang et al. answered the question: What are the best possible parameters λ and μ such that the double inequality L λ (a,b) < T(a,b) < L μ (a,b) holds for all a,b > 0 with ab? where L r (a,b) = (ar+1+ br+1)/(a r + b r ) is the r th Lehmer mean of a and b.

Chu et al. [7] proved that inequalities
p T ( a , b ) + ( 1 - p ) G ( a , b ) < A ( a , b ) < q T ( a , b ) + ( 1 - q ) G ( a , b )

hold for all a,b > 0 with ab if and only if p ≤ 3/5 and qπ/4.

Hou and Chu [9] gave the best possible parameters α and β such that the double inequality
α S ( a , b ) + ( 1 - α ) H ¯ ( a , b ) < T ( a , b ) < β S ( a , b ) + ( 1 - β ) H ¯ ( a , b )

holds for all a, b > 0 with ab.

For fixed a, b > 0 with ab, let x [1/2,1] and
f ( x ) = S ( x a + ( 1 - x ) b , x b + ( 1 - x ) a ) .
Then it is not difficult to verify that f(x) is continuous and strictly increasing in [1/2,1]. Note that f(1/2) = A(a,b) < T(a,b) and f(1) = S(a, b) > T(a, b). Therefore, it is natural to ask what are the greatest value α and least value β in (1/2,1) such that the double inequality
S ( α a + ( 1 - α ) b , α b + ( 1 - α ) a ) < T ( a , b ) < S ( β a + ( 1 - β ) b , β b + ( 1 - β ) a )

holds for all a, b > 0 with ab. The main purpose of this article is to answer these questions. Our main result is the following Theorem 1.1.

Theorem 1.1. If α, β (1/2,1), then the double inequality
S ( α a + ( 1 - α ) b , α b + ( 1 - α ) a ) < T ( a , b ) < S ( β a + ( 1 - β ) b , β b + ( 1 - β ) a )
(1.3)

holds for all a,b > 0 with ab if and only if α ( 1 + 16 / π 2 - 1 ) / 2 and β ( 3 + 6 ) / 6 .

2 Proof of Theorem 1.1

Proof of Theorem 1.1. Let λ = ( 1 + 16 / π 2 - 1 ) / 2 and μ = ( 3 + 6 ) / 6 .

We first proof that inequalities
T ( a , b ) > S ( λ a + ( 1 - λ ) b , λ b + ( 1 - λ ) a )
(2.1)
and
T ( a , b ) < S ( μ a + ( 1 - μ ) b , μ b + ( 1 - μ ) a )
(2.2)

hold for all a, b > 0 with ab.

From (1.1) and (1.2), we clearly see that both T(a, b) and S(a, b) are symmetric and homogenous of degree 1. Without loss of generality we assume that a > b. Let t = a/b > 1 and p (1/2,1), then from (1.1) and (1.2) one has
S ( p a + ( 1 - p ) b , p b + ( 1 - p ) a ) - T ( a , b ) = b [ p t + ( 1 - p ) ] 2 + [ ( 1 - p ) t + p ] 2 2 arctan t - 1 t + 1 × 2 arctan ( t - 1 t + 1 ) - t - 1 [ p t + ( 1 - p ) ] 2 + [ ( 1 - p ) t + p ] 2 .
(2.3)
Let
f ( t ) = 2 arctan t - 1 t + 1 - t - 1 [ p t + ( 1 - p ) ] 2 + [ ( 1 - p ) t + p ] 2 ,
(2.4)
then simple computations lead to
f ( 1 ) = 0 ,
(2.5)
lim t + f ( t ) = 2 π 4 - 1 p 2 + ( 1 - p ) 2 ,
(2.6)
f ( t ) = f 1 ( t ) { [ p t + ( 1 - p ) ] 2 + [ ( 1 - p ) t + p ] 2 } 3 2 ( t 2 + 1 ) ,
(2.7)
where
f 1 ( t ) = 2 { [ p t + ( 1 - p ) ] 2 + [ ( 1 - p ) t + p ] 2 } 3 2 - ( t + 1 ) ( t 2 + 1 ) .
(2.8)
Note that
{ 2 { [ p t + ( 1 - p ) ] 2 + [ ( 1 - p ) t + p ] 2 } 3 2 } 2 - [ ( t + 1 ) ( t 2 + 1 ) ] 2 = ( t - 1 ) 2 g 1 ( t ) ,
(2.9)
where
g 1 ( t ) = ( 16 p 6 - 48 p 5 + 72 p 4 - 64 p 3 + 36 p 2 - 12 p + 1 ) t 4 - 16 p 2 ( 4 p 2 - 4 p + 3 ) ( p - 1 ) 2 t 3 + 2 ( 48 p 6 - 144 p 5 + 168 p 4 - 96 p 3 + 36 p 2 - 12 p + 1 ) × t 2 - 16 p 2 ( 4 p 2 - 4 p + 3 ) ( p - 1 ) 2 t + 16 p 6 - 48 p 5 + 72 p 4 - 64 p 3 + 36 p 2 - 12 p + 1 ,
(2.10)
g 1 ( 1 ) = 4 ( 12 p 2 - 12 p + 1 ) .
(2.11)
Let g 2 ( t ) = g 1 ( t ) / 4 , g 3 ( t ) = g 2 ( t ) , g 4 ( t ) = g 3 ( t ) / 6 . Then simple computations lead to
g 2 ( t ) = ( 16 p 6 - 48 p 5 + 72 p 4 - 64 p 3 + 36 p 2 - 12 p + 1 ) t 3 - 12 p 2 ( 4 p 2 - 4 p + 3 ) ( p - 1 ) 2 t 2 + ( 48 p 6 - 144 p 5 + 168 p 4 - 96 p 3 + 36 p 2 - 12 p + 1 ) t - 4 p 2 ( 4 p 2 - 4 p + 3 ) ( p - 1 ) 2 ,
(2.12)
g 2 ( 1 ) = 4 ( 6 p 2 - 12 p + 1 ) ,
(2.13)
g 3 ( t ) = 3 ( 16 p 6 - 48 p 5 + 72 p 4 - 64 p 3 + 36 p 2 - 12 p + 1 ) t 2 - 24 p 2 ( 4 p 2 - 4 p + 3 ) ( p - 1 ) 2 t + 48 p 6 - 144 p 5 + 168 p 4 - 96 p 3 + 36 p 2 - 12 p + 1 ,
(2.14)
g 3 ( 1 ) = 4 ( 6 p 4 - 12 p 3 + 18 p 2 - 12 p + 1 ) ,
(2.15)
g 4 ( t ) = ( 16 p 6 - 48 p 5 + 72 p 4 - 64 p 3 + 36 p 2 - 12 p + 1 ) t - 4 p 2 ( 4 p 2 - 4 p + 3 ) ( p - 1 ) 2 ,
(2.16)
g 4 ( 1 ) = 12 p 4 - 24 p 3 + 24 p 2 - 12 p + 1 .
(2.17)

We divide the proof into two cases.

Case 1. p = λ = ( 1 + 16 / π 2 - 1 ) / 2 . Then equations (2.6), (2.11), (2.13), (2.15), and (2.17) lead to
lim t + f ( t ) = 0 ,
(2.18)
g 1 ( 1 ) = - 4 ( 5 π 2 - 48 ) π 2 < 0 ,
(2.19)
g 2 ( 1 ) = - 2 ( 5 π 2 - 48 ) π 2 < 0 ,
(2.20)
g 3 ( 1 ) = - 2 ( 7 π 4 - 48 π 2 - 192 ) π 4 < 0 ,
(2.21)
g 4 ( 1 ) = - 2 ( π 4 - 96 ) π 4 < 0 .
(2.22)
Note that
16 p 6 - 48 p 5 + 72 p 4 - 64 p 3 + 36 p 2 - 12 p + 1 = 1024 - π 6 π 6 > 0 .
(2.23)
From (2.10), (2.12), (2.14), (2.16), and (2.23) we clearly see that
lim t + g 1 ( t ) = +
(2.24)
lim t + g 2 ( t ) = +
(2.25)
lim t + g 3 ( t ) = +
(2.26)
lim t + g 4 ( t ) = +
(2.27)

From equation (2.16) and inequality (2.23) we clearly see that g4(t) is strictly increasing in [1, + ∞), then inequality (2.22) and equation (2.27) lead to the conclusion that there exists t0 > 1 such that g4(t) < 0 for t (1,t0) and g4(t) > 0 for t (t0,+∞). Hence, g3(t) is strictly decreasing in [1, t0] and strictly increasing in [t0, +∞).

It follows from (2.21) and (2.26) together with the piecewise monotonicity of g3(t) that there exists t1 > t0 > 1 such that g2(t) is strictly decreasing in [1,t1] and strictly increasing in [t1,+∞).

From (2.20) and (2.25) together with the piecewise monotonicity of g2(t) we conclude that there exists t2 > t1 > 1 such that g1(t) is strictly decreasing in [1,t2] and strictly increasing in [t2,+∞).

Equations (2.7)-(2.9), (2.19), and (2.24) together with the piecewise monotonicity of g1(t) imply that there exists t3 > t2 > 1 such that f(t) is strictly decreasing in [1,t3] and strictly increasing in [t3, +∞).

Therefore, inequality (2.1) follows from equations (2.3)-(2.5) and (2.18) together with the piecewise monotonicity of f(t).

Case 2. p = μ = ( 3 + 6 ) / 6 . Then equation (2.10) becomes
g 1 ( t ) = ( 17 t 2 + 2 t + 17 ) 108 ( t - 1 ) 2 > 0
(2.28)

for t > 1.

Equations (2.7)-(2.10) and inequality (2.28) lead to the conclusion that f(t) is strictly increasing in [1, +∞).

Therefore, inequality (2.2) follows from equations (2.3)-(2.5) and the monotonicity of f(t).

From the monotonicity of f(x) = S(xa + (1 - x)b, xb + (1- x)a) in [1/2,1] and inequalities (2.1) and (2.2) we know that inequality (1.3) holds for all α ( 1 + 16 / π 2 - 1 ) / 2 , β ( 3 + 6 ) / 6 and a, b > 0 with ab.

Next, we prove that λ = ( 1 + 16 / π 2 - 1 ) / 2 is the best possible parameter in (1/2,1) such that inequality (2.1) holds for all a, b > 0 with ab.

For any 1 > p > λ = ( 1 + 16 / π 2 - 1 ) / 2 , from (2.6) one has
lim t + f ( t ) = π 2 - 1 p 2 + ( 1 - p ) 2 > 0 .
(2.29)
Equations (2.3) and (2.4) together with inequality (2.29) imply that for any 1 > p > λ = ( 1 + 16 / π 2 - 1 ) / 2 there exists T0 = T0(p) > 1 such that
S ( p a + ( 1 - p ) b , p b + ( 1 - p ) a ) > T ( a , b )

for a/b (T0, + ∞).

Finally, we prove that μ = ( 3 + 6 ) / 6 is the best possible parameter in (1/2,1) such that inequality (2.2) holds for all a, b > 0 with ab.

For any 1 / 2 < p < μ = ( 3 + 6 ) / 6 , from (2.11) one has
g 1 ( 1 ) = 4 ( 12 p 2 - 12 p + 1 ) < 0 .
(2.30)
From inequality (2.30) and the continuity of g1(t) we know that there exists δ = δ(p) > 0 such that
g 1 ( t ) < 0
(2.31)

fort (1,1 + δ).

Equations (2.3)-(2.5) and (2.7)-(2.10) together with inequality (2.31) imply that for any 1 / 2 < p < μ = ( 3 + 6 ) / 6 there exists δ = δ(p) > 0 such that
T ( a , b ) > S ( p a + ( 1 - p ) b , p b + ( 1 - p ) a )

for a/b (1,1 + δ).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 11071069, the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province under Grant 09JJ6003 and the Innovation Team Foundation of the Department of Education of Zhejiang Province under Grant T200924.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics and Computing Science, Hunan City University
(2)
Department of Mathematics, Hangzhou Normal University

References

  1. Seiffert HJ: Aufgabe β 16. Die Wurzel 1995, 29: 221–222.Google Scholar
  2. Neuman E, Sándor J: On the Schwab-Borchardt mean. Math Pannon 2003, 14(2):253–266.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Neuman E, Sándor J: On the Schwab-Borchardt mean II. Math Pannon 2006, 17(1):49–59.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Pahikkala J: On contraharmonic mean and Phythagorean triples. Elem Math 2010, 65(2):62–67.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Chu Y-M, Wang M-K, Qiu Y-F: An optimal double inequality between power-type Heron and Seiffert means. J Inequal Appl 2010., 11: 2010, (Article ID 146945)Google Scholar
  6. Wang M-K, Qiu Y-F, Chu Y-M: Sharp bounds for Seiffert means in terms of Lehmer means. J Math Inequal 2010, 4(4):581–586.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Chu Y-M, Zong C, Wang G-D: Optimal convex combination bounds of Seiffert and geometric means for the arithmetic mean. J Math Inequal 2011, 5(3):429–434.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu H, Meng X-J: The optimal convex combination bounds for the Seiffert's mean. J Inequal Appl 2011., 9: 2011, (Article ID 686384)Google Scholar
  9. Hou S-W, Chu Y-M: Optimal convex combination bounds of root-square and harmonic root-square means for Seiffert mean. Int J Math Anal 2011, 5(39):1897–1904.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Pillichshammer F: On the root mean square weighted L2discrepancy of scrambled nets. J Complex 2004, 20(5):638–653. 10.1016/j.jco.2003.08.007MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Petitjean M: On the root mean square quantitative chirality and quantitative symmetry measures. J Math Phys 1999, 40(9):4587–4595. 10.1063/1.532988MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Nelsen RB: Proof without words: the harmonic mean-geometric mean-arithmetic mean-root mean square inequality. Math Mag 1987, 60(3):158–158.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Abul-Magd AY, Simbel MH, Farag MYH: Volume integrals and root-mean-square radii of the optical potential. Canad J Phys 1980, 58(8):1230–1237. 10.1139/p80-162MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kamat AR: On the mean successive difference and its ratio to the root mean square. Biometrika 1953, 40: 116–127.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Chu et al; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.