Open Access

Some sharp integral inequalities involving partial derivatives

Journal of Inequalities and Applications20122012:109

https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-109

Received: 1 February 2012

Accepted: 18 May 2012

Published: 18 May 2012

Abstract

The main purpose of the present article is to establish some new sharp integral inequalities in 2n independent variables. Our results in special cases yield some of the recent results on Pachpatter, Agarwal and Sheng's inequalities and provide some new estimates on such types of inequalities.

Mathematics Subject Classification 2000: 26D15.

Keywords

Cauchy-Schwarz's inequality Pachpatte's inequality Hölder integral inequality the arithmetic-geometric means inequality

1 Introduction

Inequalities involving functions of n independent variables, their partial derivatives, integrals play a fundamental role in establishing the existence and uniqueness of initial and boundary value problems for ordinary and partial differential equations as well as difference equations [110]. Especially, in view of wider applications, inequalities due to Agarwal, Opial, Pachpatte, Wirtinger, Poincaréand et al. have been generalized and sharpened from the very day of their discover. As a matter of fact these now have become research topic in their own right [1114]. In the present article we shall use the same method of Agarwal and Sheng [15], establish some new estimates on these types of inequalities involving 2n independent variables. We further generalize these inequalities which lead to result sharp than those currently available. An important characteristic of our results is that the constants in the inequalities are explicit.

2 Main results

Let R be the set of real numbers and n the n-dimensional Euclidean space. Let E, E' be a bounded domain in R n defined by E × E = i = 1 n [ a i , b i ] × [ c i , d i ] , i = 1 , . . . , n . For x i , y i R, i = 1, ..., n, (x, y) = (x1, ..., x n , y1, ..., y n ) is a variable point in E × E' and dxdy = dx1 ... dx n dy1 ... dy n . For any continuous real-valued function u(x, y) defined on E × E' we denote by ∫ E E'u(x, y) dxdy the 2n-fold integral
a 1 b 1 a n b n c 1 d 1 c n d n u ( x 1 , , x n , y 1 , , y n ) d x 1 d x n d y 1 d y n ,
and for any (x, y) E × E', ∫E(x) ∫E'(x)u(s, t) dsdt is the 2n-fold integral
a 1 x 1 a n x n c 1 y 1 c n y n u ( s 1 , , s n , t 1 , , t n ) d x 1 d s n d t 1 d t n ,
We represent by F(E × E') the class of continuous functions u(x, y) : E × E' → , for each i,1 ≤ in,
u ( x , y ) | x i = a i = 0 , u ( x , y ) | y i = c i = 0 , u ( x , y ) | x i = b i = 0 , u ( x , y ) | y i = d i = 0 , ( i = 1 , , n )

the class F(E × E') is denoted as G(E × E').

Theorem 2.1. Let l, μ, λ ≥ 1, be given real numbers such that 1 μ + 1 λ = 1 . Further, let u(x, y) G(E × E'). Then, the following inequality holds
E E u ( x , y ) l d x d y 1 2 n i = 1 n [ ( b i - a i ) ( c i - d i ) ] μ 1 / μ E E u ( x , y ) ( l - 1 ) μ d x d y 1 / μ × E E grad u ( x , y ) λ λ d x d y 1 / λ ,
(2.1)
where
grad u ( x , y ) λ = i = 1 n 2 x i y i u ( x , y ) λ 1 / λ .
Proof. For each fixed i, 1 ≤ in, in view of
u ( x , y ) | x i = a i = 0 , u ( x , y ) | y i = c i = 0 , u ( x , y ) | x i = b i = 0 , u ( x , y ) | y i = d i = 0 , ( i = 1 , , n )
we have
u l ( x , y ) = u l - 1 ( x , y ) a i x i c i y i 2 s i t i u ( x , y ; s i , t i ) d s i d t i ,
(2.2)
and
u l ( x , y ) = u l - 1 ( x , y ) x i b i y i d i 2 s i t i u ( x , y ; s i , t i ) d s i d t i ,
(2.3)
where
u ( x , y ; s i , t i ) = u ( x 1 , , x i - 1 , s i , x i + 1 , , x n , y 1 , , y i - 1 , t i , y i + 1 , , y n ) .
Hence, from (2.2) and (2.3) and in view of the arithmetic-geometric means inequality and Hölder inequality with indices μ and λ, it follows that
u ( x , y ) l 1 2 u ( x , y ) l - 1 a i b i c i d i 2 s i t i u ( x , y ; s i , t i ) d s i d t i 1 2 u ( x , y ) l - 1 [ ( b i - a i ) ( c i - d i ) ] 1 / μ a i x i c i y i 2 s i t i u ( x , y ; s i , t i ) λ d s i d t i 1 / λ .
(2.4)
Now, summing the inequalities (2.4) for 1 ≤ in, integrating over E × E' and applying Holder inequality with indices μ and λ two times, we get
E E u ( x , y ) l d x d y 1 2 n i = 1 n [ ( b i - a i ) ( c i - d i ) ] 1 / μ × E E u ( x , y ) l - 1 a i b i c i d i 2 s i t i u ( x , y ; s i , t i ) λ d s i d t i 1 / λ d x d y 1 2 n E E u ( x , y ) ( l - 1 ) μ d x d y 1 / μ i = 1 n [ ( b i - a i ) ( c i - d i ) ] 1 / μ × E E a i b i c i d i 2 s i t i u ( x , y ; s i , t i ) λ d s i d t i d x d y 1 / λ 1 2 n E E u ( x , y ) ( l - 1 ) μ d x d y 1 / μ i = 1 n [ ( b i - a i ) ( c i - d i ) ] 1 / μ + 1 / λ × E E 2 x i y i u ( x , y ) λ d x d y 1 / λ 1 2 n E E u ( x , y ) ( l - 1 ) μ d x d y 1 / μ i = 1 n [ ( b i - a i ) ( c i - d i ) ] μ 1 / μ × E E grad u ( x , y ) λ λ d x d y 1 / λ ,
where
grad u ( x , y ) λ = i = 1 n 2 x i y i u ( x , y ) λ 1 / λ .

The proof is complete.

Remark 2.1. Let u(x, y) reduce to u(x) in (2.1) and with suitable modifications, then (2.1) becomes
E u ( x ) ( l ) μ d x 1 2 n E u ( x ) ( l - 1 ) μ d x 1 / μ i = 1 n ( b i - a i ) μ 1 / μ × E grad u ( x ) λ λ d x 1 / λ ,
where
grad u ( x ) λ = i = 1 n x i u ( x ) λ 1 / λ .

This is just a important inequality which was given by Agarwal and Sheng [15].

Remark 2.2. For the given real numbers l k ≥ 0, 1 ≤ kr, such that rl k ≥ 1, the arithmetic-geometric means inequality and (2.1) gives
E E k = 1 r u k ( x , y ) l k d x d y 1 r k = 1 r E E u k ( x , y ) r l k d x d y 1 2 n r i = 1 n [ ( b i - a i ) ( c i - d i ) ] μ 1 / μ k = 1 r E E u k ( x , y ) ( r l k - 1 ) μ d x d y 1 / μ × E E grad u k ( x , y ) λ λ d x d y 1 / λ .
(2.5)
This is just a general form of the following result which was given by Agarwal and Sheng [15].
E k = 1 r u k ( x ) l k d x 1 2 n r i = 1 n ( b i - a i ) μ 1 / μ k = 1 r E u k ( x ) ( r l k - 1 ) μ d x 1 / μ × E grad u k ( x ) λ λ d x 1 / λ ,
where
grad u k ( x ) λ = i = 1 n x i u ( x ) λ 1 / λ .
Remark 2.3. In particular, for l k = (p k + 2)/(2r), p k ≥ 1,1 ≤ kr, μ = λ = 2, the inequality (2.5) reduces to
E E k = 1 r u k ( x , y ) ( p k + 2 ) / 2 1 / r d x d y 1 2 n r i = 1 n [ ( b i - a i ) ( c i - d i ) ] 2 1 / 2 k = 1 r E E u ( x , y ) p k d x d y 1 / 2 × E E grad u k ( x , y ) 2 2 d x d y 1 / 2 .
This is just a general form of the following result which was given by Agarwal and Sheng [15].
E k = 1 r u k ( x ) ( p k + 2 ) / 2 1 / r d x 1 2 n r i = 1 n ( b i - a i ) 2 1 / 2 k = 1 r E u ( x ) p k d x 1 / 2 E grad u k ( x ) 2 2 d x 1 / 2 .

On the other hand, the above inequality with the right-hand side multiplied by k = 1 r ( ( p k + 2 ) / 2 ) 1 / r and the term i = 1 n ( b i - a i ) 2 1 / 2 replace by n β has been proved by Pachpatte [16].

Remark 2.4. If u(x, y) reduce to u(x) in (2.1), then the inequality (2.1) and its particular case l ≥ 2, μ = λ = 2 with the right-hand side multiplied by l have been separately proved by Pachpatte in [17].

Theorem 2.2. Let λ ≥ 1 and u(x, y) G(E × E'). Then, the following inequality holds
E E u ( x , y ) 2 λ d x d y π λ 2 β 2 α 2 1 2 8 n E E u ( x , y ) 2 λ d x d y ( λ - 1 ) / λ × E E i = 1 n 2 u s i t i + ( λ - 1 ) 1 u ( x , y ) u x i u y i 2 λ d x d y 1 / λ ,
(2.6)

where β = max1≤in(b i - a i ) and α = max1≤in(d i - c i ).

Proof. For each fixed i, 1 ≤ in, we obtain that
u λ ( x , y ) = λ a i x i c i y i u λ - 1 ( x , y ; s i , t i ) 2 u s i t i + ( λ - 1 ) u λ - 2 ( x , y ; s i , t i ) u s i u t i d s i d t i ,
and hence from the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, it follows that
u ( x , y ) λ λ 2 ( x i - a i ) ( y i - c i ) × a i x i c i y i y λ - 1 ( x , y ; s i , t i ) 2 u s i t i + ( λ - 1 ) u λ - 2 ( x , y ; s i , t i ) u s i u t i 2 d s i d t i ,
(2.7)
and similarly,
u ( x , y ) λ λ 2 ( b i - x i ) ( d i - y i ) × x i b i y i d i u λ - 1 ( x , y ; s i , t i ) 2 u s i t i + ( λ - 1 ) u λ - 2 ( x , y ; s i , t i ) u s i u t i 2 d s i d t i ,
(2.8)
Hence, multiplying (2.7) and (2.8) and in view of using the arithmetic-geometric means inequality, summing the resulting inequalities for 1 ≤ in, and then integrating over E × E', to obtain
E E u ( x , y ) 2 λ d x d y λ 2 2 n E E i = 1 n [ ( x i - a i ) ( y i - c i ) ( b i - x i ) ( d i - y i ) ] 1 / 2 × a i b i c i d i u λ - 1 ( x , y ; s i , t i ) 2 u s i t i + ( λ - 1 ) u λ - 2 ( x , y ; s i , t i ) u s i u t i 2 d s i d t i d x d y = λ 2 2 n i = 1 n a i b i c i d i [ ( x i - a i ) ( y i - c i ) ( b i - x i ) ( d i - y i ) ] 1 / 2 d x i d y i × E E y λ - 1 ( x , y ) 2 u s i t i + ( λ - 1 ) u λ - 2 ( x , y ) u x i u y i 2 d x d y π λ 2 β 2 α 2 1 2 8 n E E i = 1 n u λ - 1 ( x , y ) 2 u s i t i + ( λ - 1 ) u λ - 2 ( x , y ) u x i u y i 2 d x d y ,

where β = max1≤in(b i - a i ) and α = max1≤in(d i - c i ).

Hence, using Hölder inequality with indices λ and λ/(λ - 1) in right-hand side of above inequality, we have
E E u ( x , y ) 2 λ d x d y π λ 2 β 2 α 2 1 2 8 n E E u ( x , y ) 2 λ d x d y ( λ - 1 ) / λ × E E i = 1 n 2 u s i t i + ( λ - 1 ) 1 u ( x , y ) u x i u y i 2 λ d x d y 1 / λ .

The proof is complete.

Remark 2.5. Let u(x, y) reduce to u(x) in (2.6) and with suitable modifications, then (2.6) becomes the following Agarwal and Sheng [15] inequality.
E u ( x ) 2 λ d x π λ 2 β 2 1 6 n E u ( x ) 2 λ d x ( λ - 1 ) / λ E grad u ( x ) 2 2 λ d x 1 / λ ,

where β = max1≤in(b i - a i ).

Theorem 2.3. Let l ≥ 0, m ≥ 1 be given real numbers, and let u(x, y) G(E × E').

Then, the following inequality holds
E E u ( x , y ) l + m d x d y 1 n m + l 2 m m i = 1 n [ ( b i - a i ) ( d i - c i ) ] m × E E u l / m ( x , y ) 2 u x i y i + l m u ( l / m - 1 ) ( x , y ) u x i u y i m d x d y .
(2.8a)
Proof. For each fixed i, 1 ≤ in, we obtain that
u l + m ( x , y ) = m + l m [ u ( x , y ) ] ( m - 1 ) ( l + m ) / m × a i x i c i y i u l / m ( x , y ; s i , t i ) 2 u s i t i + l m u ( l / m - 1 ) ( x , y ; s i , t i ) u s i u t i d s i d t i ,
and, hence, it follows that
u ( x , y ) l + m m + l m u ( x , y ) ( m - 1 ) ( l + m ) / m × a i x i c i y i u l / m ( x , y ; s i , t i ) 2 u s i t i + l m u ( l / m - 1 ) ( x , y ; s i , t i ) u s i u t i d s i d t i ,
(2.9)
and, similarly,
u ( x , y ) l + m m + l m u ( x , y ) ( m - 1 ) ( l + m ) / m × x i b i y i d i u l / m ( x , y ; s i , t i ) 2 u s i t i + l m u ( l / m - 1 ) ( x , y ; s i , t i ) u s i u t i d s i d t i .
(2.10)
Now, adding (2.9) and (2.10) and integrating the resulting inequality from a i to b i and c i to d i , respectively. Then
a i b i c i d i u ( x , y ) l + m d x i d y i m + l 2 m a i b i c i d i u ( x , y ) ( m - 1 ) ( l + m ) / m d x i d y i × a i b i c i d i u l / m ( x , y ) 2 u x i y i + l m u ( l / m - 1 ) ( x , y ) u x i u y i d x i d y i .
Next in each integral of the right-hand side of the above inequality we apply Hölder inequality with indices m and m/(m - 1), to get
a i b i c i d i u ( x , y ) l + m d x i d y i m + l 2 m a i b i c i d i u ( x , y ) l + m d x i d y i ( m - 1 ) / m × [ ( b i - a i ) ( d i - c i ) ] 1 / m [ ( b i - a i ) ( d i - c i ) ] ( m - 1 ) / m × a i b i c i d i u l / m ( x , y ) 2 u x i y i + l m u ( l / m - 1 ) ( x , y ) u x i u y i m d x i d y i 1 / m ,
which is unless a i b i c i d i u ( x , y ) l + m d x i d y i = 0 (for which the inequality (2.8) is obvious), is the same as
a i b i c i d i u ( x , y ) l + m d x i d y i 1 / m m + l 2 m [ ( b i - a i ) ( d i - c i ) ] × a i b i c i d i u l / m ( x , y ) 2 u x i y i + l m u ( l / m - 1 ) ( x , y ) u x i u y i m d x i d y i 1 / m .

Finally, raising m-th power both sides of the above inequality, integrating the resulting inequality from a j to b j and c j to d j , respectively, then summing the n inequalities 1 ≤ in, we find the desired inequality (2.8).

Remark 2.6. Let u(x, y) reduce to u(x) in (2.8) and with suitable modifications, then (2.8) becomes the following Agarwal and Sheng [15] inequality.
E u ( x ) l + m d x 1 n m + l 2 m m i = 1 n ( b i - a i ) m E u ( x ) l x i u ( x ) m d x .

Remark 2.7. The inequality (2.8) for u(x, y) reduce to u(x), with the right-hand sides multiplied by m m and (b i - a i ) m replaced by (αβ) m has been obtained by Pachpatte [18].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

C.-J. Zhao research was supported by National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (10971205). W.-S. Cheung research was partially supported by a HKU URG grant.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics, China Jiliang University
(2)
Department of Mathematics, The University of Hong Kong
(3)

References

  1. Agarwal RP, Pang PYH: Opial Inequalities with Applications in Differential and Difference Equations. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht; 1995.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal RP, Lakshmikantham V: Uniqueness and Nonuniqueness Criteria for Ordinary Differential Equations. World Scientific, Singapore; 1993.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal RP, Thandapani E: On some new integrodifferential inequalities Anal sti Univ. "Al I Cuza" din Iasi 1982, 28: 123–126.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Bainov D, Simeonov P: Integral Inequalities and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht; 1992.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Li JD: Opial-type integral inequalities involving several higher order derivatives. J Math Anal Appl 1992, 167: 98–100. 10.1016/0022-247X(92)90238-9MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Mitrinovič DS, Pečarić JE, Fink AM: Inequalities involving Functions and Their Integrals ang Derivatives. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht; 1991.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheung WS: On Opial-type inequalities in two variables. Aequationes Math 1989, 38: 236–244. 10.1007/BF01840008MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheung WS: Some new Opial-type inequalities. Mathematika 1990, 37: 136–142. 10.1112/S0025579300012869MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheung WS: Some generalized Opial-type inequalities. J Math Anal Appl 1991, 162: 317–321. 10.1016/0022-247X(91)90152-PMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheung WS: Opial-type inequalities with m functions in n variables. Mathematika 1992, 39: 319–326. 10.1112/S0025579300015047MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Crooke PS: On two inequalities of the Sobolev type. Appl Anal 1974, 3: 345–358. 10.1080/00036817408839076MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Pachpatte BG: Opial type inequality in several variables. Tamkang J Math 1991, 22: 7–11.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Pachpatte BG: On some new integral inequalities in two independent variables. J Math Anal Appl 1988, 129: 375–382. 10.1016/0022-247X(88)90256-9MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang XJ: Sharp constant in a Sobolev inequality. Nonlinear Anal 1993, 20: 261–268. 10.1016/0362-546X(93)90162-LMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Agarwal RP, Sheng Q: Sharp integral inequalities in n independent varibles. Nonlinear Anal Theory Methods Appl 1996, 26(2):179–210. 10.1016/0362-546X(94)00273-KMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Pachpatte BG: On Sobolev type integral inequalities. Proc R Soc Edinb 1986, 103: 1–14. 10.1017/S0308210500013986View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Pachpatte BG: On two inequalities of the Serrin type. J Math Anal Appl 1986, 116: 193–199. 10.1016/0022-247X(86)90051-XMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Pachpatte BG: On some variants of Sobolev's inequality. Soochow J Math 1991, 17: 121–129.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhao et al; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.