- Research Article
- Open Access

# A Note on Generalized -Summability Factors for Infinite Series

- Ekrem Savaş
^{1}Email author

**2010**:814974

https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/814974

© Ekrem Savaş. 2010

**Received:**9 September 2009**Accepted:**14 December 2009**Published:**12 January 2010

## Abstract

A general theorem concerning the —summability factors of infinite series has been proved.

## Keywords

- Real Number
- Natural Number
- Satisfying Condition
- Triangular Matrix
- Positive Sequence

## 1. Introduction

A weighted mean matrix, denoted by , is a lower triangular matrix with entries , where is a nonnegative sequence with , and .

Mishra and Srivastava [1] obtained sufficient conditions on a sequence and a sequence for the series to be absolutely summable by the weighted mean matrix .

Recently Savaş and Rhoades [2] established the corresponding result for a nonnegative triangle, using the correct definition of absolute summability of order .

Let be an infinite lower triangular matrix. We may associate with two lower triangular matrices and , whose entries are defined by

respectively. The motivation for these definitions will become clear as we proceed.

Let be an infinite matrix. The series is said to be absolutely summable by , of order , written as , if

where is the forward difference operator and denotes the term of the matrix transform of the sequence , where .

Thus

since .

A sequence is said to be of bounded variation if Let where denotes the set of all null sequences.

A positive sequence is said to be an almost increasing sequence if there exist an increasing sequence and positive constants and such that (see [3]). Obviously, every increasing sequence is almost increasing. However, the converse need not be true as can be seen by taking the example, say .

A positive sequence is said to be a quasi -power increasing sequence if there exists a constant such that

holds for all . It should be noted that every almost increasing sequence is quasi -power increasing sequence for any nonnegative , but the converse need not be true as can be seen by taking an example, say for (see [4]). If (1.4) stays with then is simply called a quasi-increasing sequence. It is clear that if is quasi -power increasing then is quasi-increasing.

A positive sequence is said to be a quasi- -power increasing sequence, if there exists a constant such that holds for all , where , , was considered instead of (see [5, 6]).

Given any sequence , the notation means and .

Quite recently, Savaş and Rhoades [2] proved the following theorem for -summability factors of infinite series.

Theorem 1.1.

Let be a triangle with nonnegative entries satisfying

(i) ,

(ii) for ,

(iii) ,

(iv) , and

(v) .

If is a positive nondecreasing sequence and the sequences and satisfy

(vi) ,

(vii) ,

(viii) ,

(ix) , and

(x) ,

then the series is summable .

It should be noted that if is an almost increasing sequence then (viii) implies that the sequence is bounded. However, when is a quasi -power increasing sequence or a quasi -increasing sequence, (viii) does not imply , For example, since is a quasi -power increasing sequence for if we take , then , holds but (see [7]).

The goal of this paper is to prove a theorem by using quasi -increasing sequences. We show that the crucial condition of our proof, can be deduced from another condition of the theorem.

## 2. The Main Results

We have the following theorem:

Theorem 2.1.

are satisfied, then the series is summable , where , , , and

Theorem 2.1 includes the following theorem with the special case .

Theorem 2.2.

are satisfied, where then the series is summable .

If we take that is an almost increasing sequence instead of a quasi -power increasing sequence then our Theorem 2.2 reduces to [8, Theorem ].

Remark 2.3.

The crucial condition, and condition (viii) do not appear among the conditions of Theorems 2.1 and 2.2. By Lemma 3.3, under the conditions on and as taken in the statement of the Theorem 2.1, also in the statement of Theorem 2.2 with the special case conditions and (viii) hold.

## 3. Lemmas

We shall need the following lemmas for the proof of our main Theorem 2.1.

Lemma 3.1 (see [9]).

for all

Lemma 3.2 (see [7]).

Lemma 3.3 (see [7]).

If is a quasi -increasing sequence, where , , then under conditions (vi), (vii), (2.1) and (2.2), conditions (viii) and (3.5) are satisfied.

Lemma 3.4 (see [7]).

## 4. Proof of Theorem 2.1

Let denote the th term of the -transform of the partial sums of the series . Then, we have

Thus,

It is easy to see that

Also we may write

Therefore, for

Now

From [2],

Thus, using (iv) and (ii),

Hence, using Hölder's inequality, (v), (iii), and the fact that the 's are bounded,

as in the proof of .

It follows from (3.6) that and hence that by condition (vi).

Using (iii), Hölder's inequality, and (v),

Since
by (*x*), we have

Using Abel's transformation, (vi), (2.2), and properties (3.7) and (3.6) of Lemma 3.4,

Using the boundedness of
and (*x*),

as in the proof of .

A weighted mean matrix, written is a lower triangular matrix with entries where is a nonnegative sequence with and as

Corollary 4.1.

Let be a positive sequence satisfying

(i) and

(ii)

and let and be sequences satisfying conditions (vi), (vii), and (2.1). If is a quasi -increasing sequence, where , and conditions (x) and (2.2) are satisfied, then the series is summable , .

## Declarations

### Acknowledgment

The author wishes to thank the referees for their careful reading of the manuscript and for their helpful suggestions.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Mishra KN, Srivastava RSL: On summability factors of infinite series.
*Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics*1984, 15(6):651–656.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Savaş E, Rhoades BE: A note on summability factors for infinite series.
*Journal of Inequalities and Applications*2007, 2007:-8.Google Scholar - Alijancic S, Arendelovic D: -regularly varying functions.
*Publications de l'Institut Mathématique*1977, 22(36):5–22.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Leindler L: A new application of quasi power increasing sequences.
*Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen*2001, 58(4):791–796.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Sulaiman WT: Extension on absolute summability factors of infinite series.
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2006, 322(2):1224–1230. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.09.019MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Şevli H: General absolute summability factor theorems involving quasi-power-increasing sequences.
*Mathematical and Computer Modelling*2009, 50(7–8):1121–1127. 10.1016/j.mcm.2009.05.031MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Savaş E, Şevli H: A recent note on quasi-power increasing sequence for generalized absolute summability.
*Journal of Inequalities and Applications*2009, 2009:-10.Google Scholar - Saxena SKr: A note on summability factors for a triangular matrix.
*International Journal of Mathematical Analysis*2008, 2(21–24):1103–1110.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Leindler L: A note on the absolute Riesz summability factors. Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics 2005, 6(4, article 96):-5.Google Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.