- Research Article
- Open Access
A Note on Mixed-Mean Inequalities
© Peng Gao. 2010
- Received: 25 February 2010
- Accepted: 29 June 2010
- Published: 14 July 2010
We give a simpler proof of a result of Holland concerning a mixed arithmetic-geometric mean inequality. We also prove a result of mixed-mean inequality involving the symmetric means.
- Convex Function
- General Pair
- Symmetric Function
- Simple Proof
- Equality Hold
Let be the generalized weighted power means: , where , , and , with . Here denotes the limit of as . Unless specified, we always assume that . When there is no risk of confusion, we will write for and we also define .
Now we focus our attention to the case of (1.2) for being weighted mean matrices given in (1.3). In this case, for fixed , we define , . Then we have the following mixed-mean inequalities of Nanjundiah  (see also ).
It is easy to see that the case of Theorem 1.1 follows from Theorem 1.2. As was pointed out by Kedlaya that the method used in  can be applied to establish both Popoviciu-type and Rado-type inequalities for mixed means for a general pair , the details were worked out in  and the following Rado-type inequalities were established in .
A different proof of Theorem 1.1 for the case was given in  and Bennett used essentially the same approach in [8, 9] to study (1.2) for the cases being lower triangular matrices, namely, if . Among other things, he showed  that inequalities (1.2) hold when are Hausdorff matrices.
In , Holland further improved the condition in Theorem 1.3 for the case by proving the following.
It is our goal in this paper to first give a simpler proof of the above result by modifying Holland's own approach. This is done in the next section and, in Section 3, we will prove a result of mixed-mean inequality involving the symmetric means.
Now it is easy to see that inequality (2.5) follows on adding inequalities (2.7) and (2.8), and this completes the proof of Theorem 1.4.
It is well known that, for fixed of dimension , is a nonincreasing function of for with (with weights , ). In view of the mixed-mean inequalities for the generalized weighted power means (Theorem 1.1), it is natural to ask whether similar results hold for the symmetric means. Of course one may have to adjust the notion of such mixed means in order for this to make sense for all . For example, when , , the notion of is not even defined. From now on, we will only focus on the extreme cases of the symmetric means; namely, or . In these cases it is then natural to define , and, on recasting , we see that it is also natural for us to define (note that this is not consistent with our definition of above).
We also need the following lemma of C. D. Tarnavas and D. D. Tarnavas .
We now apply Lemma 3.2 to obtain the following.
which is just what we want.
We now prove the following mixed-mean inequality involving the symmetric means.
- Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Pólya G: Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1952:xii+324.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Čižmešija A, Pečarić J: Mixed means and Hardy's inequality. Mathematical Inequalities & Applications 1998, 1(4):491–506.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Nanjundiah TS: Sharpening of some classical inequalities. Math Student 1952, 20: 24–25.Google Scholar
- Bullen PS: Inequalities due to T. S. Nanjundiah. In Recent Progress in Inequalities. Volume 430. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 1998:203–211.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kedlaya KS: A weighted mixed-mean inequality. The American Mathematical Monthly 1999, 106(4):355–358. 10.2307/2589560MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tarnavas CD, Tarnavas DD: An inequality for mixed power means. Mathematical Inequalities & Applications 1999, 2(2):175–181.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Kedlaya K: Proof of a mixed arithmetic-mean, geometric-mean inequality. The American Mathematical Monthly 1994, 101(4):355–357. 10.2307/2975630MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Bennett G: An inequality for Hausdorff means. Houston Journal of Mathematics 1999, 25(4):709–744.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Bennett G: Summability matrices and random walk. Houston Journal of Mathematics 2002, 28(4):865–898.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Holland F: An inequality between compositions of weighted arithmetic and geometric means. Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics 2006, 7, article 159:-8.Google Scholar
- Marcus M, Lopes L: Inequalities for symmetric functions and Hermitian matrices. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 1957, 9: 305–312. 10.4153/CJM-1957-037-9MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Beckenbach EF, Bellman R: Inequalities. Springer, Berlin, Germany; 1961:xii+198.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Knopp K: Über Reihen mit positiven Gliedern. Journal of the London Mathematical Society 1928, 3: 205–211. 10.1112/jlms/s1-3.3.205MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Knopp K: Über Reihen mit positiven Gliedern (Zweite Mitteilung). Journal of the London Mathematical Society 1930, 5: 13–21. 10.1112/jlms/s1-5.1.13MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Duncan J, McGregor CM: Carleman's inequality. The American Mathematical Monthly 2003, 110(5):424–431. 10.2307/3647829MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.