# A New Iteration Method for Nonexpansive Mappings and Monotone Mappings in Hilbert Spaces

- JongSoo Jung
^{1}Email author

**2010**:251761

https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/251761

© Jong Soo Jung. 2010

**Received: **5 October 2009

**Accepted: **20 December 2009

**Published: **12 January 2010

## Abstract

We introduce a new composite iterative scheme by the viscosity approximation method for nonexpansive mappings and monotone mappings in a Hilbert space. It is proved that the sequence generated by the iterative scheme converges strongly to a common point of set of fixed points of nonexpansive mapping and the set of solutions of variational inequality for an inverse-strongly monotone mappings, which is a solution of a certain variational inequality. Our results substantially develop and improve the corresponding results of [Chen et al. 2007 and Iiduka and Takahashi 2005]. Essentially a new approach for finding the fixed points of nonexpansive mappings and solutions of variational inequalities for monotone mappings is provided.

## Keywords

## 1. Introduction

Let
be a real Hilbert space and
a nonempty closed convex subset of
. Recall that a mapping
is a *contraction* on
if there exists a constant
such that
We use
to denote the collection of mappings
verifying the above inequality. That is
. A mapping
is called *nonexpansive* if
; see [1, 2] for the results of nonexpansive mappings. We denote by
the set of fixed points of
; that is,

Let
be the metric projection of
onto
. A mapping
of
into
is called *monotone* if for
,
. The *variational inequality problem* is to find a
such that

for all
; see [3–6]. The set of solutions of the variational inequality is denoted by
. A mapping
of
into
is called *inverse-strongly monotone* if there exists a positive real number
such that

for all ; see [7–9]. For such a case, is called -inverse-strongly monotone.

In 2005, Iiduka and Takahashi [10] introduced an iterative scheme for finding a common point of the set of fixed points of a nonexapnsive mapping and the set of solutions of the variational inequality for an inverse-strong monotone mapping as follows. For an -inverse-strongly monotone mapping of to and a nonexpansive mapping of into itself such that , , , and ,

for every . They proved that the sequence generated by (1.3) converges strongly to under the conditions on and for some with ,

Moreover, in [12], he also studied the strong convergence of generated by (1.5) as in either a Hilbert space or a uniformly smooth Banach space and showed that the strong is a solution of a certain variational inequality.

In 2007, Chen et al. [13] considered the following iterative scheme as the viscosity approximation method of (1.3). For an -inverse-strongly-monotone mapping of to and a nonexpansive mapping of into itself such that , , , , and ,

and showed that the sequence generated by (1.6) converges strongly to a point in under condition (1.4) on and , which is a solution of a certain variational inequality.

In this paper, motivated by above-mentioned results, we introduce a new composite iterative scheme by the viscosity approximation method. For an -inverse-strongly monotone mapping of to and a nonexpansive mapping of into itself such that , , , , and ,

If , then the iterative scheme (1.7) reduces to the iterative scheme (1.6). Under condition (1.4) on the sequences and and appropriate condition on sequence , we show that the sequence generated by (1.7) converges strongly to a point in , which is a solution of a certain variational inequality. Using this result, we also obtain a strong convergence result for finding a common fixed point of a nonexpansive mapping and a strictly pseudocontractive mapping. Moreover, we investigate the problem of finding a common point of the set of fixed points of a nonexpansive mapping and the set of zeros of an inverse-strongly monotone mapping. The main results develop and improve the corresponding results of Chen et al. [13] and Iiduka and Takahashi [10]. We point out that the iterative scheme (1.7) is a new approach for finding the fixed points of nonexpansive mappings and solutions of variational inequalities for monotone mappings.

## 2. Preliminaries and Lemmas

Let be a real Hilbert space with inner product and norm , and a closed convex subset of . We write to indicate that the sequence converges weakly to . implies that converges strongly to . For every point , there exists a unique nearest point in , denoted by , such that

for all
.
is called the *metric projection* of
to
. It is well known that
satisfies

for all . In the context of the variational inequality problem, this implies that

We state some examples for inverse-strongly monotone mappings. If
, where
is a nonexpansive mapping of
into itself and
is the identity mapping of
, then
is
-inverse-strongly monotone and
. A mapping
of
into
is called *strongly monotone* if there exists a positive real number
such that

for all
. In such a case, we say that
is
-strongly monotone. If
is
-strongly monotone and
-*Lipschitz continuous*, that is,
for all
, then
is
-inverse-strongly monotone.

If is an -inverse-strongly monotone mapping of into , then it is obvious that is -Lipschitz continuous. We also have that for all and ,

So, if , then is a nonexpansive mapping of into . The following result for the existence of solutions of the variational inequality problem for inverse-strongly monotone mappings was given in Takahashi and Toyoda [14].

Proposition 2.1.

Let be a bounded closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space and an -inverse-strongly monotone mapping of into . Then, is nonempty.

A set-valued mapping
is called *monotone* if for all
,
and
imply
. A monotone mapping
is *maximal* if the graph
of
is not properly contained in the graph of any other monotone mapping. It is known that a monotone mapping
is maximal if and only if for
,
for every
implies
. Let
be an inverse-strongly monotone mapping of
into
and let
be the *normal cone* to
at
, that is,
, and define

Then is maximal monotone and if and only if ; see [15, 16].

We need the following lemmas for the proof of our main results.

Lemma 2.2 (see [17]).

where and satisfy the following conditions:

Lemma 2.3 (see [1], demiclosedness principle).

Let be a real Hilbert space, a nonempty closed convex subset of , and a nonexpansive mapping. Then the mapping is demiclosed on , where is the identity mapping; that is, in and imply that and .

Lemma 2.4.

## 3. Main Results

In this section, we introduce a new composite iterative scheme for nonexpansive mappings and inverse-strongly monotone mappings and prove a strong convergence of this scheme.

Theorem 3.1.

where , , and . If , and satisfy the following conditions:

Proof.

We divide the proof into several steps.

Step 1.

Step 2.

By (3.11), we also have that as .

Step 3.

Step 4.

Step 5.

Hence we have as . Since is maximal monotone, we have and hence .

Step 6.

and . It is easily seen that , , and . Thus by Lemma 2.2, we obtain . This completes the proof.

- (1)
Theorem 3.1 improves the corresponding results in Chen et al. [13] and Iiduka and Takahashi [10]. In particular, if and is constant in (3.1), then Theorem 3.1 reduces to Theorem 3.1 of Iiduka and Takahashi [10].

- (2)We obtain a new composite iterative scheme for a nonexpansive mapping if in Theorem 3.1 as follows (see also Jung [18]):

As a direct consequence of Theorem 3.1, we have the following result.

Corollary 3.3.

where , , and . If , , and satisfy the following conditions:

## 4. Applications

In this section, as in [10, 13], we obtain two theorems in a Hilbert space by using Theorem 3.1.

A mapping
is called *strictly pseudocontractive* if there exists
with
such that

for every . If , then is nonexpansive. Put , where is a strictly pseudocontractive mapping with . Then is -inverse-strongly monotone; see [7]. Actually, we have, for all ,

On the other hand, since is a real Hilbert space, we have

Hence we have

Using Theorem 3.1, we first get a strong convergence theorem for finding a common fixed point of a nonexpansive mapping and a strictly pseudocontractive mapping.

Theorem 4.1.

where , , and . If , , and satisfy the conditions:

Proof.

Put . Then is -inverse-strongly monotone. We have and . Thus, the desired result follows from Theorem 3.1.

Using Theorem 3.1, we also have the following result.

Theorem 4.2.

where , , and . If , , and satisfy the conditions:

Proof.

We have . So, putting , by Theorem 3.1, we obtain the desired result.

Remark 4.3.

If in Theorems 4.1 and 4.2, then Theorems 4.1 and 4.2 reduce to Chen et al. [13, Theorems 4.1 and 4.2]. Theorems 4.1 and 4.2 also extend in Iiduka and Takahashi [10, Theorems 4.1 and 4.2] to the viscosity methods in composite iterative schemes.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2009-0064444). The author thanks the referees for their valuable comments and suggestions, which improved the presentation of this paper.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Goebel K, Kirk WA:
*Topics in Metric Fixed Point Theory, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics*.*Volume 28*. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1990:viii+244.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Takahashi W:
*Nonlinear Functional Analysis: Fixed Point Theory and Its Applications*. Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama, Japan; 2000:iv+276.Google Scholar - Browder FE: Nonlinear monotone operators and convex sets in Banach spaces.
*Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society*1965, 71: 780–785. 10.1090/S0002-9904-1965-11391-XMATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bruck RE Jr.: On the weak convergence of an ergodic iteration for the solution of variational inequalities for monotone operators in Hilbert space.
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*1977, 61(1):159–164. 10.1016/0022-247X(77)90152-4MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lions PL, Stampacchia G: Variational inequalities.
*Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics*1967, 20: 493–517. 10.1002/cpa.3160200302MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Takahashi W: Nonlinear complementarity problem and systems of convex inequalities.
*Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications*1978, 24(3):499–506. 10.1007/BF00932892MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Browder FE, Petryshyn WV: Construction of fixed points of nonlinear mappings in Hilbert space.
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*1967, 20: 197–228. 10.1016/0022-247X(67)90085-6MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Iiduka H, Takahashi W, Toyoda M: Approximation of solutions of variational inequalities for monotone mappings.
*Panamerican Mathematical Journal*2004, 14(2):49–61.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Liu F, Nashed MZ: Regularization of nonlinear ill-posed variational inequalities and convergence rates.
*Set-Valued Analysis*1998, 6(4):313–344. 10.1023/A:1008643727926MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Iiduka H, Takahashi W: Strong convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings and inverse-strongly monotone mappings.
*Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2005, 61(3):341–350. 10.1016/j.na.2003.07.023MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Moudafi A: Viscosity approximation methods for fixed-points problems.
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2000, 241(1):46–55. 10.1006/jmaa.1999.6615MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Xu H-K: Viscosity approximation methods for nonexpansive mappings.
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2004, 298(1):279–291. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.04.059MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Chen J, Zhang L, Fan T: Viscosity approximation methods for nonexpansive mappings and monotone mappings.
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2007, 334(2):1450–1461. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.12.088MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Takahashi W, Toyoda M: Weak convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings and monotone mappings.
*Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications*2003, 118(2):417–428. 10.1023/A:1025407607560MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rockafellar RT: On the maximality of sums of nonlinear monotone operators.
*Transactions of the American Mathematical Society*1970, 149: 75–88. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1970-0282272-5MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rockafellar RT: Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm.
*SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization*1976, 14(5):877–898. 10.1137/0314056MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Xu H-K: An iterative approach to quadratic optimization.
*Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications*2003, 116(3):659–678. 10.1023/A:1023073621589MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Jung JS: Strong convergence on composite iterative methods for nonexpansive mappings.
*Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society*2009, 46(6):1143–1156.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.