- Research Article
- Open access
- Published:
Applications of Wirtinger Inequalities on the Distribution of Zeros of the Riemann Zeta-Function
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2010, Article number: 215416 (2011)
Abstract
On the hypothesis that the th moments of the Hardy
-function are correctly predicted by random matrix theory and the moments of the derivative of
are correctly predicted by the derivative of the characteristic polynomials of unitary matrices, we establish new large spaces between the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function by employing some Wirtinger-type inequalities. In particular, it is obtained that
which means that consecutive nontrivial zeros often differ by at least 6.1392 times the average spacing.
1. Introduction
The Riemann zeta-function is defined by
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ1_HTML.gif)
and by analytic continuation elsewhere except for a simple pole at . The identity between the Dirichlet series and the Euler product (taken over all prime numbers
) is an analytic version of the unique prime factorization in the ring of integers and reflects the importance of the zeta-function for number theory. The functional equation
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ2_HTML.gif)
implies the existence of so-called trivial zeros of at
for any positive integer
; all other zeros are said to be nontrivial and lie inside the so-called critical strip
. The number
of nontrivial zeros of
with ordinates in the interval
,
is asymptotically given by the Riemann-von Mangoldt formula (see [1])
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ3_HTML.gif)
Consequently, the frequency of their appearance is increasing and the distances between their ordinates is tending to zero as .
The Riemann zeta-function is one of the most studied transcendental functions, having in view its many applications in number theory, algebra, complex analysis, and statistics as well as in physics. Another reason why this function has drawn so much attention is the celebrated Riemann conjecture regarding nontrivial zeros which states that all nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta-function lie on the critical line
. The distribution of zeros of
is of great importance in number theory. In fact any progress in the study of the distribution of zeros of this function helps to investigate the magnitude of the largest gap between consecutive primes below a given bound. Clearly, there are no zeros in the half plane of convergence
, and it is also known that
does not vanish on the line
. In the negative half plane,
and its derivative are oscillatory and from the functional equation there exist so-called trivial (real) zeros at
for any positive integer
(corresponding to the poles of the appearing Gamma-factors), and all nontrivial (nonreal) zeros are distributed symmetrically with respect to the critical line
and the real axis.
There are three directions regarding the studies of the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function. The first direction is concerned with the existence of simple zeros. It is conjectured that all or at least almost all zeros of the zeta-function are simple. For this direction, we refer to the papers by Conrey [2] and Cheer and Goldston [3].
The second direction is the most important goal of number theorists which is the determination of the moments of the Riemann zeta-function on the critical line. It is important because it can be used to estimate the maximal order of the zeta-function on the critical line, and because of its applicability in studying the distribution of prime numbers and divisor problems. For more details of the second direction, we refer the reader to the papers in [4–6] and the references cited therein. For further classical results from zeta-function theory, we refer to the monograph [7] of Ivić and the papers by Kim [8–11].
For completeness in the following we give a brief summary of some of these results in this direction that we will use in the proof of the main results. It is known that the behavior of on the critical line is reflected by the Hardy
-function
as a function of a real variable, defined by
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ4_HTML.gif)
It follows from the functional equation (1.2) that is an infinitely often differentiable function which is real for real
and moreover
. Consequently, the zeros of
correspond to the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function on the critical line. An important problem in analytic number theory is to gain an understanding of the moments of the Hardy
-function
function
and the moments of its derivative
which are defined by
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ5_HTML.gif)
For positive real numbers , it is believed that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ6_HTML.gif)
for positive constants and
will be defined later.
Keating and Snaith [12] based on considerations from random matrix theory conjectured that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ7_HTML.gif)
where
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ8_HTML.gif)
where is the Barnes
-function (for the definition of the Barnes
-function and its properties, we refer to [5]).
Hughes [5] used the Random Matrix Theory (RMT) and stated an interesting conjecture on the moments of the Hardy -function and its derivatives at its zeros subject to the truth of Riemann's hypothesis when the zeros are simple. This conjecture includes for fixed
the asymptotic formula of the moments of the form
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ9_HTML.gif)
where is defined as in (1.8) and the product is over the primes. Hughes [5] was able to establish the explicit formula
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ10_HTML.gif)
in the range , where
is an explicit rational function of
for each fixed
. The functions
as introduced by Hughes [5] are given in the following:
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ11_HTML.gif)
where , This sequence is continuous, and it is believed that both the nominator and denominator are monic polynomials in
. Using (1.10) and the definitions of the functions
, we can obtain the values of
for
. As indicated in [13] Hughes [5] evaluated the first four functions and then writes a numerical experiment suggesting the next three. The values of
for
have been collected in [6]. To the best of my knowledge there is no explicit formula to find the values of the function
for
. This limitation of the values of
leads to the limitation of the values of the lower bound between the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function by applying the moments (1.9). To overcame this restriction, we will use a different explicit formula of the moments to establish new values of the distance between zeros.
Conrey et al. [4] established the moments of the derivative, on the unit circle, of characteristic polynomials of random unitary matrices and used this to formulate a conjecture for the moments of the derivative of the Riemann zeta-function on the critical line. Their method depends on the fact that the distribution of the eigenvalues of unitary matrices gives insight into the distribution of zeros of the Riemann zeta-function and the values of the characteristic polynomials of the unitary matrices give a model for the value distribution of the Riemann zeta-function. Their formulae are expressed in terms of a determinant of a matrix whose entries involve the -Bessel function and, alternately, by a combinatorial sum. They conjectured that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ12_HTML.gif)
where is the arithmetic factor and defined as in (1.8) and
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ13_HTML.gif)
where
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ14_HTML.gif)
and denotes the set of partitions
of
into nonnegative parts. They also gave some explicit values of
for
. These values will be presented in Section 2 and will be used to establish the main results in this paper.
The third direction in the studies of the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function is the gaps between the zeros (finding small gaps and large gaps between the zeros) on the critical line when the Riemann hypothesis is satisfied. In the present paper we are concerned with the largest gaps between the zeros on the critical line assuming that the Riemann hypothesis is true.
Assuming the truth of the Riemann hypothesis Montgomery [14] studied the distribution of pairs of nontrivial zeros and
and conjectured, for fixed α,
satisfying
, that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ15_HTML.gif)
This so-called pair correlation conjecture plays a complementary role to the Riemann hypothesis. This conjecture implies the essential simplicity hypothesis that almost all zeros of the zeta-function are simple. On the other hand, the integral on the right hand side is the same as the one observed in the two-point correlation of the eigenvalues which are the energy levels of the corresponding Hamiltonian which are usually not known with uncertainty. This observation is due to Dyson and it restored some hope in an old idea of Hilbert and Polya that the Riemann hypothesis follows from the existence of a self-adjoint Hermitian operator whose spectrum of eigenvalues correspond to the set of nontrivial zeros of the zeta-function.
Now, we assume that are the zeros of
in the upper half-plane (arranged in nondecreasing order and counted according multiplicity) and
are consecutive ordinates of all zeros and define
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ16_HTML.gif)
and set
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ17_HTML.gif)
These numbers have received a great deal of attention. In fact, important results concerning the values of them have been obtained by some authors. It is generally believed that and
. Selberg [15] proved that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ18_HTML.gif)
and the average of is 1. Note that
is the average spacing between zeros. Fujii [16] also showed that there exist constants
and
such that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ19_HTML.gif)
for a positive proportion of . Mueller [17] obtained
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ20_HTML.gif)
assuming the Riemann hypothesis. Montgomery and Odlyzko [18] showed, assuming the Riemann hypothesis, that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ21_HTML.gif)
Conrey et al. [19] improved the bounds in (1.21) and showed that, if the Riemann hypothesis is true, then
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ22_HTML.gif)
Conrey et al. [20] obtained a new lower bound and proved that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ23_HTML.gif)
assuming the generalized Riemann hypothesis for the zeros of the Dirichlet -functions. Bui et al. [21] improved (1.23) and obtained
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ24_HTML.gif)
assuming the Riemann hypothesis. Ng in [22] improved (1.24) and proved that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ25_HTML.gif)
assuming the generalized Riemann hypothesis for the zeros of the Dirichlet -functions.
Hall in [23] (see also Hall [24]) assumed that is the sequence of distinct positive zeros of the Riemann zeta-function
arranged in nondecreasing order and counted according multiplicity and defined the quantity
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ26_HTML.gif)
and showed that , and the lower bound for
bear direct comparison with such bounds for
dependent on the Riemann hypothesis, since if this were true the distinction between
and
would be nugatory. Of course
and the equality holds if the Riemann hypothesis is true. Hall [23] used a Wirtinger-type inequality of Beesack and proved that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ27_HTML.gif)
In [25] Hall proved a Wirtinger inequality and used the moment
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ28_HTML.gif)
due to Ingham [26], and the moments
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ29_HTML.gif)
due to Conrey [27], and obtained
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ30_HTML.gif)
Hall [24] proved a new generalized Wirtinger-type inequality by using the calculus of variation and obtained a new value of which is given by
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ31_HTML.gif)
Hall [28] employed the generalized Wirtinger inequality obtained in [24], simplified the calculus used in [24] and converted the problem into one of the classical theory of equations involving Jacobi-Schur functions. Assuming that the moments in (1.9) are correctly predicted by RMT, Hall [28] proved that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ32_HTML.gif)
In [29] the authors applied a technique involving the comparison of the continuous global average with local average obtained from the discrete average to a problem of gaps between the zeros of zeta-function assuming the Riemann hypothesis. Using this approach, which takes only zeros on the critical line into account, the authors computed similar bounds under assumption of the Riemann hypothesis when (1.9) holds. They then showed that for fixed positive integer
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ33_HTML.gif)
holds for any for more than
proportion of the zeros
with a computable constant
.
Hall [13] developed the technique used in [28] and proved that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ34_HTML.gif)
The improvement of this value as obtained in [13] is given by
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ35_HTML.gif)
In this paper, first we apply some well-known Wirtinger-type inequalities and the moments of the Hardy -function and the moments of its derivative to establish some explicit formulas for
. Using the values of
and
, we establish some lower bounds for
which improves the last value of
. In particular it is obtained that
which means that consecutive nontrivial zeros often differ by at least 6.1392 times the average spacing. To the best of the author knowledge the last value obtained for
in the literature is the value obtained by Hall in (1.35) and nothing is known regarding
for
.
2. Main Results
In this section, we establish some explicit formulas for and by using the same explicit values of
and
we establish new lower bounds for
. The explicit values of
using the formula
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ36_HTML.gif)
are calculated in the following for :
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ37_HTML.gif)
The explicit values of the parameter that has been determined by Conrey et al. [4] for
are given in the following:
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ38_HTML.gif)
Now, we are in a position to prove our first results in this section which gives an explicit formula of the gaps between the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function. This will be proved by applying an inequality due to Agarwal and Pang [30].
Theorem 2.1.
Assuming the Riemann hypothesis, one has
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ39_HTML.gif)
Proof.
To prove this theorem, we employ the inequality
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ40_HTML.gif)
with and
, that has been proved by Agarwal and Pang [30]. As in [25] by a suitable linear transformation, we can deduce from (2.5) that if
and
, then
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ41_HTML.gif)
Now, we follow the proof of [24] and supposing that is the first zero of
not less than
and
the last zero not greater than
. Suppose further that for
, we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ42_HTML.gif)
and apply the inequality (2.6), to obtain
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ43_HTML.gif)
Since the inequality remains true if we replace by
, we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ44_HTML.gif)
Summing (2.9) over , applying (1.7), (1.12) and as in [24], we obtain
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ45_HTML.gif)
whence
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ46_HTML.gif)
This implies that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ47_HTML.gif)
and then we obtain the desired inequality (2.1). The proof is complete.
Using the values of and
and (2.1) we have the new lower values for
for
in Table 1.
One can easily see that the value of in Table 1 does not improve the lower bound in (1.35) due to Hall, but the the approach that we used is simple and depends only on a well-known Wirtinger-type inequality and the asymptotic formulas of the moments. In the following, we employ a different inequality due to Brnetić and Pečarić [31] and establish a new explicit formula for
and then use it to find new lower bounds.
Theorem 2.2.
Assuming the Riemann hypothesis, one has
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ48_HTML.gif)
where is defined by
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ49_HTML.gif)
Proof.
To prove this theorem, we apply the inequality
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ50_HTML.gif)
that has been proved by Brnetić and Pečarić [31], where is continuous function on
with
. Proceeding as in the proof of Theorem 2.1 and employing (2.15), we may have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ51_HTML.gif)
This implies that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ52_HTML.gif)
which is the desired inequality (2.13). The proof is complete.
To find the new lower bounds for we need the values of
for
. These values are calculated numerically in Table 2.
Using these values and the values of ,
, and the explicit formula (2.13) we have the new lower bounds for
in Table 3.
We note from Table 3 that the value of improves the value
that has been obtained by Hall.
Finally, in the following we will employ an inequality to Beesack [32, page 59] and establish a new explicit formula for and use it to find new values of its lower bounds.
Theorem 2.3.
Assuming the Riemann hypothesis, one has
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ53_HTML.gif)
Proof.
To prove this theorem, we apply the inequality
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ54_HTML.gif)
that has been proved by Beesack [32, page 59], where is continuous function on
with
. Proceeding as in Theorem 2.1 by using (2.19), we may have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ55_HTML.gif)
This implies that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ56_HTML.gif)
which is the desired inequity (2.18). The proof is complete.
Using these values and the values of ,
, and the explicit formula in (2.18) we have the new lower bounds for
in Table 4.
We note from Table 4, that the values of for
are compatible with the values of
for
that has been obtained by Hall [13, Table
] and since there is no explicit value of
for
, to obtain the values of
for
the author in [13] stopped the estimation for
for
.
We notice that the calculations can be continued as above just if one knows the explicit values of for
where the values
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F215416/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2087_Equ57_HTML.gif)
are easy to calculate. Note that the values of that we have used in this paper are adapted from the paper by Conrey et al. [4]. It is clear that the values of
are increasing with the increase of
and this may help in proving the conjecture of the distance between of the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function.
References
Garunkštis R, Steuding J: Simple zeros and discrete moments of the derivative of the Riemann zeta-function. Journal of Number Theory 2005, 115(2):310–321. 10.1016/j.jnt.2004.12.006
Conrey JB: More than two fifths of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are on the critical line. Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik 1989, 399: 1–26.
Cheer AY, Goldston DA: Simple zeros of the Riemann zeta-function. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1993, 118(2):365–372. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1993-1132849-0
Conrey JB, Rubinstein MO, Snaith NC: Moments of the derivative of characteristic polynomials with an application to the Riemann zeta function. Communications in Mathematical Physics 2006, 267(3):611–629. 10.1007/s00220-006-0090-5
Hughes CPThesis, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, 2001 Thesis, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, 2001
Steuding J: The Riemann zeta-function and moment conjectures from random matrix theory. Mathematica Slovaca 2009, 59(3):323–338. 10.2478/s12175-009-0129-0
Ivić A: The Riemann zeta-function. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 1985:xvi+517.
Kim T: Euler numbers and polynomials associated with zeta functions. Abstract and Applied Analysis 2008, 2008:-11.
T. Kim, Barnes-type multiple
-zeta functions and
-Euler polynomials, Journal of Physics, vol. 43,no. 25, 11 pages, 2010.
Kim T: Note on the Euler
-zeta functions. Journal of Number Theory 2009, 129(7):1798–1804. 10.1016/j.jnt.2008.10.007
Kim T: On
-adic interpolating function for
-Euler numbers and its derivatives. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2008, 339(1):598–608. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.07.027
Keating JP, Snaith NC: Random matrix theory and
. Communications in Mathematical Physics 2000, 214(1):57–89. 10.1007/s002200000261
Hall RR: Large spaces between the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function and random matrix theory. II. Journal of Number Theory 2008, 128(10):2836–2851. 10.1016/j.jnt.2007.11.011
Montgomery HL: The pair correlation of zeros of the zeta function. In Analytic Number Theory (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics ). Volume 24. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA; 1973:181–193.
Selberg A: The zeta-function and the Riemann hypothesis. Skandinaviske Mathematiker-kongres 1946, 10: 187–200.
Fujii A: On the difference between
consecutive ordinates of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function. Proceedings of the Japan Academy 1975, 51(10):741–743. 10.3792/pja/1195518466
Mueller J: On the difference between consecutive zeros of the Riemann zeta function. Journal of Number Theory 1982, 14(3):327–331. 10.1016/0022-314X(82)90067-1
Montgomery HL, Odlyzko AM: Gaps between zeros of the zeta function. In Topics in Classical Number Theory, Vol. I, II. Volume 34. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 1984:1079–1106.
Conrey JB, Ghosh A, Gonek SM: A note on gaps between zeros of the zeta function. The Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 1984, 16(4):421–424. 10.1112/blms/16.4.421
Conrey JB, Ghosh A, Gonek SM: Large gaps between zeros of the zeta-function. Mathematika 1986, 33(2):212–238. 10.1112/S0025579300011219
Bui HM, Milinovich MB, Ng NC: A note on the gaps between consecutive zeros of the Riemann zeta-function. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 2010, 138(12):4167–4175. 10.1090/S0002-9939-2010-10443-4
Ng N: Large gaps between the zeros of the Riemann zeta function. Journal of Number Theory 2008, 128(3):509–556. 10.1016/j.jnt.2007.03.011
Hall RR: The behaviour of the Riemann zeta-function on the critical line. Mathematika 1999, 46(2):281–313. 10.1112/S0025579300007762
Hall RR: Generalized Wirtinger inequalities, random matrix theory, and the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function. Journal of Number Theory 2002, 97(2):397–409. 10.1016/S0022-314X(02)00005-7
Hall RR: A Wirtinger type inequality and the spacing of the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function. Journal of Number Theory 2002, 93(2):235–245. 10.1006/jnth.2001.2719
Ingham AE: Mean theorems in the theorem of the Riemann zeta-function. Proceedings London Mathematical Society 1928, 27: 273–300. 10.1112/plms/s2-27.1.273
Conrey JB: The fourth moment of derivatives of the Riemann zeta-function. The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics 1988, 39(153):21–36.
Hall RR: Large spaces between the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function and random matrix theory. Journal of Number Theory 2004, 109(2):240–265. 10.1016/j.jnt.2004.01.007
Steuding R, Steuding J: Large gaps between zeros of the zeta-function on the critical line and moment conjectures from random matrix theory. Computational Methods and Function Theory 2008, 8(1–2):121–132.
Agarwal RP, Pang PYH: Remarks on the generalizations of Opial's inequality. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1995, 190(2):559–577. 10.1006/jmaa.1995.1091
Brnetić I, Pečarić J: Some new Opial-type inequalities. Mathematical Inequalities & Applications 1998, 1(3):385–390.
Beesack PR: Hardy's inequality and its extensions. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 1961, 11: 39–61.
Acknowledgments
The author is very grateful to the anonymous referees for valuable remarks and comments which significantly contributed to the quality of the paper. The author thanks Deanship of Scientific Research and the Research Centre in College of Science in King Saud University for encouragements and supporting this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Saker, S. Applications of Wirtinger Inequalities on the Distribution of Zeros of the Riemann Zeta-Function. J Inequal Appl 2010, 215416 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/215416
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/215416