 Research Article
 Open Access
Applications of Wirtinger Inequalities on the Distribution of Zeros of the Riemann ZetaFunction
 SamirH Saker^{1, 2}Email author
https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/215416
© Samir H. Saker. 2010
 Received: 10 October 2010
 Accepted: 17 December 2010
 Published: 4 January 2011
Abstract
On the hypothesis that the th moments of the Hardy function are correctly predicted by random matrix theory and the moments of the derivative of are correctly predicted by the derivative of the characteristic polynomials of unitary matrices, we establish new large spaces between the zeros of the Riemann zetafunction by employing some Wirtingertype inequalities. In particular, it is obtained that which means that consecutive nontrivial zeros often differ by at least 6.1392 times the average spacing.
Keywords
 Explicit Formula
 Critical Line
 Unitary Matrice
 Random Matrix Theory
 Riemann Hypothesis
1. Introduction
Consequently, the frequency of their appearance is increasing and the distances between their ordinates is tending to zero as .
The Riemann zetafunction is one of the most studied transcendental functions, having in view its many applications in number theory, algebra, complex analysis, and statistics as well as in physics. Another reason why this function has drawn so much attention is the celebrated Riemann conjecture regarding nontrivial zeros which states that all nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zetafunction lie on the critical line . The distribution of zeros of is of great importance in number theory. In fact any progress in the study of the distribution of zeros of this function helps to investigate the magnitude of the largest gap between consecutive primes below a given bound. Clearly, there are no zeros in the half plane of convergence , and it is also known that does not vanish on the line . In the negative half plane, and its derivative are oscillatory and from the functional equation there exist socalled trivial (real) zeros at for any positive integer (corresponding to the poles of the appearing Gammafactors), and all nontrivial (nonreal) zeros are distributed symmetrically with respect to the critical line and the real axis.
There are three directions regarding the studies of the zeros of the Riemann zetafunction. The first direction is concerned with the existence of simple zeros. It is conjectured that all or at least almost all zeros of the zetafunction are simple. For this direction, we refer to the papers by Conrey [2] and Cheer and Goldston [3].
The second direction is the most important goal of number theorists which is the determination of the moments of the Riemann zetafunction on the critical line. It is important because it can be used to estimate the maximal order of the zetafunction on the critical line, and because of its applicability in studying the distribution of prime numbers and divisor problems. For more details of the second direction, we refer the reader to the papers in [4–6] and the references cited therein. For further classical results from zetafunction theory, we refer to the monograph [7] of Ivić and the papers by Kim [8–11].
for positive constants and will be defined later.
where is the Barnes function (for the definition of the Barnes function and its properties, we refer to [5]).
where , This sequence is continuous, and it is believed that both the nominator and denominator are monic polynomials in . Using (1.10) and the definitions of the functions , we can obtain the values of for . As indicated in [13] Hughes [5] evaluated the first four functions and then writes a numerical experiment suggesting the next three. The values of for have been collected in [6]. To the best of my knowledge there is no explicit formula to find the values of the function for . This limitation of the values of leads to the limitation of the values of the lower bound between the zeros of the Riemann zetafunction by applying the moments (1.9). To overcame this restriction, we will use a different explicit formula of the moments to establish new values of the distance between zeros.
and denotes the set of partitions of into nonnegative parts. They also gave some explicit values of for . These values will be presented in Section 2 and will be used to establish the main results in this paper.
The third direction in the studies of the zeros of the Riemann zetafunction is the gaps between the zeros (finding small gaps and large gaps between the zeros) on the critical line when the Riemann hypothesis is satisfied. In the present paper we are concerned with the largest gaps between the zeros on the critical line assuming that the Riemann hypothesis is true.
This socalled pair correlation conjecture plays a complementary role to the Riemann hypothesis. This conjecture implies the essential simplicity hypothesis that almost all zeros of the zetafunction are simple. On the other hand, the integral on the right hand side is the same as the one observed in the twopoint correlation of the eigenvalues which are the energy levels of the corresponding Hamiltonian which are usually not known with uncertainty. This observation is due to Dyson and it restored some hope in an old idea of Hilbert and Polya that the Riemann hypothesis follows from the existence of a selfadjoint Hermitian operator whose spectrum of eigenvalues correspond to the set of nontrivial zeros of the zetafunction.
assuming the generalized Riemann hypothesis for the zeros of the Dirichlet functions.
holds for any for more than proportion of the zeros with a computable constant .
In this paper, first we apply some wellknown Wirtingertype inequalities and the moments of the Hardy function and the moments of its derivative to establish some explicit formulas for . Using the values of and , we establish some lower bounds for which improves the last value of . In particular it is obtained that which means that consecutive nontrivial zeros often differ by at least 6.1392 times the average spacing. To the best of the author knowledge the last value obtained for in the literature is the value obtained by Hall in (1.35) and nothing is known regarding for .
2. Main Results
Now, we are in a position to prove our first results in this section which gives an explicit formula of the gaps between the zeros of the Riemann zetafunction. This will be proved by applying an inequality due to Agarwal and Pang [30].
Theorem 2.1.
Proof.
and then we obtain the desired inequality (2.1). The proof is complete.
Table 1






1.2442  1.7675  2.2265  2.6544  3.0545 





3.4259  3.7676  4.0806  4.3681  4.6342 





4.8827  5.1169  5.3393  5.5515  5.7550 
One can easily see that the value of in Table 1 does not improve the lower bound in (1.35) due to Hall, but the the approach that we used is simple and depends only on a wellknown Wirtingertype inequality and the asymptotic formulas of the moments. In the following, we employ a different inequality due to Brnetić and Pečarić [31] and establish a new explicit formula for and then use it to find new lower bounds.
Theorem 2.2.
Proof.
which is the desired inequality (2.13). The proof is complete.
Table 2































Table 3






1.3505  1.9902  2.4905  2.9389  3.3508 





3.7287  4.0736  4.3875  4.6742  4.9384 





5.1845  5.4159  5.6353  5.8444  6.0449 
We note from Table 3 that the value of improves the value that has been obtained by Hall.
Finally, in the following we will employ an inequality to Beesack [32, page 59] and establish a new explicit formula for and use it to find new values of its lower bounds.
Theorem 2.3.
Proof.
which is the desired inequity (2.18). The proof is complete.
Table 4






1.7321  2.2635  2.7080  3.1257  3.5177 





3.8814  4.215  4.5196  4.7985  5.0560 





5.2962  5.5225  5.7373  5.9424  6.1392 
We note from Table 4, that the values of for are compatible with the values of for that has been obtained by Hall [13, Table ] and since there is no explicit value of for , to obtain the values of for the author in [13] stopped the estimation for for .
are easy to calculate. Note that the values of that we have used in this paper are adapted from the paper by Conrey et al. [4]. It is clear that the values of are increasing with the increase of and this may help in proving the conjecture of the distance between of the zeros of the Riemann zetafunction.
Declarations
Acknowledgments
The author is very grateful to the anonymous referees for valuable remarks and comments which significantly contributed to the quality of the paper. The author thanks Deanship of Scientific Research and the Research Centre in College of Science in King Saud University for encouragements and supporting this project.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Garunkštis R, Steuding J: Simple zeros and discrete moments of the derivative of the Riemann zetafunction. Journal of Number Theory 2005, 115(2):310–321. 10.1016/j.jnt.2004.12.006MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Conrey JB: More than two fifths of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are on the critical line. Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik 1989, 399: 1–26.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
 Cheer AY, Goldston DA: Simple zeros of the Riemann zetafunction. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1993, 118(2):365–372. 10.1090/S00029939199311328490MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Conrey JB, Rubinstein MO, Snaith NC: Moments of the derivative of characteristic polynomials with an application to the Riemann zeta function. Communications in Mathematical Physics 2006, 267(3):611–629. 10.1007/s0022000600905MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Hughes CPThesis, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, 2001 Thesis, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, 2001Google Scholar
 Steuding J: The Riemann zetafunction and moment conjectures from random matrix theory. Mathematica Slovaca 2009, 59(3):323–338. 10.2478/s1217500901290MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Ivić A: The Riemann zetafunction. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 1985:xvi+517.MATHGoogle Scholar
 Kim T: Euler numbers and polynomials associated with zeta functions. Abstract and Applied Analysis 2008, 2008:11.Google Scholar
 T. Kim, Barnestype multiple zeta functions and Euler polynomials, Journal of Physics, vol. 43,no. 25, 11 pages, 2010.Google Scholar
 Kim T: Note on the Euler zeta functions. Journal of Number Theory 2009, 129(7):1798–1804. 10.1016/j.jnt.2008.10.007MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Kim T: On adic interpolating function for Euler numbers and its derivatives. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2008, 339(1):598–608. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.07.027MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Keating JP, Snaith NC: Random matrix theory and . Communications in Mathematical Physics 2000, 214(1):57–89. 10.1007/s002200000261MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Hall RR: Large spaces between the zeros of the Riemann zetafunction and random matrix theory. II. Journal of Number Theory 2008, 128(10):2836–2851. 10.1016/j.jnt.2007.11.011MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Montgomery HL: The pair correlation of zeros of the zeta function. In Analytic Number Theory (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics ). Volume 24. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA; 1973:181–193.Google Scholar
 Selberg A: The zetafunction and the Riemann hypothesis. Skandinaviske Mathematikerkongres 1946, 10: 187–200.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 Fujii A: On the difference between consecutive ordinates of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function. Proceedings of the Japan Academy 1975, 51(10):741–743. 10.3792/pja/1195518466MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Mueller J: On the difference between consecutive zeros of the Riemann zeta function. Journal of Number Theory 1982, 14(3):327–331. 10.1016/0022314X(82)900671MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Montgomery HL, Odlyzko AM: Gaps between zeros of the zeta function. In Topics in Classical Number Theory, Vol. I, II. Volume 34. NorthHolland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 1984:1079–1106.Google Scholar
 Conrey JB, Ghosh A, Gonek SM: A note on gaps between zeros of the zeta function. The Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 1984, 16(4):421–424. 10.1112/blms/16.4.421MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Conrey JB, Ghosh A, Gonek SM: Large gaps between zeros of the zetafunction. Mathematika 1986, 33(2):212–238. 10.1112/S0025579300011219MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Bui HM, Milinovich MB, Ng NC: A note on the gaps between consecutive zeros of the Riemann zetafunction. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 2010, 138(12):4167–4175. 10.1090/S000299392010104434MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Ng N: Large gaps between the zeros of the Riemann zeta function. Journal of Number Theory 2008, 128(3):509–556. 10.1016/j.jnt.2007.03.011MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Hall RR: The behaviour of the Riemann zetafunction on the critical line. Mathematika 1999, 46(2):281–313. 10.1112/S0025579300007762MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Hall RR: Generalized Wirtinger inequalities, random matrix theory, and the zeros of the Riemann zetafunction. Journal of Number Theory 2002, 97(2):397–409. 10.1016/S0022314X(02)000057MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Hall RR: A Wirtinger type inequality and the spacing of the zeros of the Riemann zetafunction. Journal of Number Theory 2002, 93(2):235–245. 10.1006/jnth.2001.2719MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Ingham AE: Mean theorems in the theorem of the Riemann zetafunction. Proceedings London Mathematical Society 1928, 27: 273–300. 10.1112/plms/s227.1.273MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Conrey JB: The fourth moment of derivatives of the Riemann zetafunction. The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics 1988, 39(153):21–36.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Hall RR: Large spaces between the zeros of the Riemann zetafunction and random matrix theory. Journal of Number Theory 2004, 109(2):240–265. 10.1016/j.jnt.2004.01.007MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Steuding R, Steuding J: Large gaps between zeros of the zetafunction on the critical line and moment conjectures from random matrix theory. Computational Methods and Function Theory 2008, 8(1–2):121–132.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Agarwal RP, Pang PYH: Remarks on the generalizations of Opial's inequality. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1995, 190(2):559–577. 10.1006/jmaa.1995.1091MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Brnetić I, Pečarić J: Some new Opialtype inequalities. Mathematical Inequalities & Applications 1998, 1(3):385–390.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Beesack PR: Hardy's inequality and its extensions. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 1961, 11: 39–61.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.