- Research Article
- Open access
- Published:
The Best Lower Bound Depended on Two Fixed Variables for Jensen's Inequality with Ordered Variables
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2010, Article number: 128258 (2010)
Abstract
We give the best lower bound for the weighted Jensen's discrete inequality with ordered variables applied to a convex function , in the case when the lower bound depends on , weights, and two given variables. Furthermore, under the same conditions, we give some sharp lower bounds for the weighted AM-GM inequality and AM-HM inequality.
1. Introduction
Let be a sequence of real numbers belonging to an interval , and let be a sequence of given positive weights associated to and satisfying . If is a convex function on , then the well-known discrete Jensen's inequality [1] states that
where
is the so-called Jensen's difference. The next refinement of Jensen's inequality was proven in [2], as a consequence of its Theorem 2.1, part (ii)
By (1.3), for fixed and , we get
In this paper, we will establish that the best lower bound of Jensen's difference for
has the expression
where
Logically, we need to have
Indeed, this inequality is equivalent to Jensen's inequality
2. Main Results
Theorem 2.1.
Let be a convex function on , and let such that
For fixed and (), Jensen's difference is minimal when
that is,
For proving Theorem 2.1, we will need the following three lemmas.
Lemma 2.2.
Let be nonnegative real numbers, and let be a convex function on . If such that and
then
Lemma 2.3.
Let be a convex function on , and let () such that
For fixed , where , Jensen's difference is minimal when
Lemma 2.4.
Let be a convex function on , and let () such that
For fixed , where , Jensen's difference is minimal when
Applying Theorem 2.1 for and using the substitutions , , we obtain
Corollary 2.5.
Let
and let be positive real numbers such that . Then,
with equality for
Using Corollary 2.5, we can prove the propositions below.
Proposition 2.6.
Let
and let be positive real numbers such that . If
then
with equality for . When , equality holds again for , , .
Proposition 2.7.
Let
and let be positive real numbers such that . Then,
with equality if and only if .
Remark 2.8.
For , from Proposition 2.6 we get the inequality
where
Equality in (2.18) holds for . If , then equality holds again for , , .
Remark 2.9.
For , from Proposition 2.7, we get the inequality
with equality if and only if .
Applying Theorem 2.1 for , we obtain
Corollary 2.10.
Let
and let be positive real numbers such that . Then,
with equality for
Remark 2.11.
For , from Corollary 2.10, we get the inequality
with equality for
If and , then (2.24) becomes
with equality for
In the case , from (2.26), we get
with equality for
Applying Theorem 2.1 for , we obtain the following.
Corollary 2.12.
Let
and let be positive real numbers such that . Then,
with equality for
Using Corollary 2.12, we can prove the following proposition.
Proposition 2.13.
Let
and let be positive real numbers such that . If
then
with equality for .
3. Proof of Lemmas
Proof of Lemma 2.2.
Since , there exist such that
In addition, from , we get
Applying Jensen's inequality twice, we obtain
and hence
Proof of Lemma 2.3.
We need to show that
Using Jensen's inequality
it suffices to prove that
which can be written as
where
Since and
by Lemma 2.2, the conclusion follows.
Proof of Lemma 2.4.
We need to prove that
By Jensen's inequality,we have
Therefore, it suffices to prove that
or, equivalently,
where
The inequality (3.14) follows from Lemma 2.2, since and
4. Proof of Theorem
Proof.
By Lemmas 2.3 and 2.4, it follows that for fixed , , Jensen's difference is minimal when and ; that is,
Therefore, towards proving (2.3), we only need to show that
Since
this inequality is a consequence of Jensen's inequality. Thus, the proof is completed.
5. Proof of Propositions
Proof of Proposition 2.6.
Using Corollary 2.5, we need to prove that
Since this inequality is homogeneous in and , and also in and , without loss of generality, assume that and . Using the notations and , where and , the inequality is equivalent to , where
with
We have
If , then
and if , then
Since for , and is increasing, , is increasing, and hence for . This concludes the proof.
Proof of Proposition 2.7.
Using Corollary 2.5, we need to prove that
Since this inequality is homogeneous in and , and also in and , we may set and . Using the notations and , where and , the inequality is equivalent to , where
We have
Since for , is strictly increasing, , and is strictly increasing, , is strictly increasing, and hence for .
Proof of Proposition 2.13.
Using Corollary 2.12, we need to prove that
This inequality is true if
For , we have
Also, for , we get
The proposition is proved.
References
Mitrinović DS, Pečarić JE, Fink AM: Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis, Mathematics and Its Applications. Volume 61. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 1993:xviii+740.
Dragomir SS, Pečarić J, Persson LE: Properties of some functionals related to Jensen's inequality. Acta Mathematica Hungarica 1996, 70(1–2):129–143. 10.1007/BF00113918
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Cirtoaje, V. The Best Lower Bound Depended on Two Fixed Variables for Jensen's Inequality with Ordered Variables. J Inequal Appl 2010, 128258 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/128258
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/128258