- Research Article
- Open Access
Equivalence of Some Affine Isoperimetric Inequalities
© Wuyang Yu. 2009
- Received: 24 May 2009
- Accepted: 10 September 2009
- Published: 28 September 2009
We establish the equivalence of some affine isoperimetric inequalities which include the -Petty projection inequality, the -Busemann-Petty centroid inequality, the "dual" -Petty projection inequality, and the "dual" -Busemann-Petty inequality. We also establish the equivalence of an affine isoperimetric inequality and its inclusion version for -John ellipsoids.
- Convex Body
- Radial Function
- Mixed Volume
- Minkowski Inequality
- Projection Body
with an equality if and only if is a centroid ellipsoid at the origin. Here, is the -centroid body of . It is also shown in  that the -Busemann-Petty inequality (1.2) implies -Petty projection inequality (1.1). A quite different proof of the -analog of the Busemann-Petty centroid inequality is obtained by Campi and Gronchi .
Lutwak et al.  showed that the following results hold.
One purpose of this paper is to establish the equivalence of some affine isopermetric inequalities as follows.
Note that (1.7) is the -Busemann-Petty centroid inequality (1.2), (1.8) is the dual form of -Busemann-Petty centroid inequality in Theorem B, (1.9) is a "dual" form of -Petty projection inequality, and (1.10) is the -Petty projection inequality (1.1).
Another purpose of this paper is to establish the follow equivalence of Theorem A and its inclusion version Theorem A'.
Some notation and background material contained in Section 2.
If is a convex body in , then its support function, , is defined for by A star body in is a nonempty compact set satisfying for all and such that the radial function , defined by is positive and continuous. Two star bodies and are said to be dilates if is independent of .
From Corollary 3.2, we know that (1.9) is an affine isoperimetric inequality.
Substitute (3.13) in (3.9) and combine (3.15) to just get (3.10); substitute (3.2) in (3.10) and combine (3.14) to just get (3.11); substitute (3.13) in (3.11) and combine (3.15) to just get (3.12); substitute (3.2) in (3.12) and combine (3.14) to just get (3.9).
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
Lemma 3.4 (see ).
Proof of Theorem 1.2.
Firstly, we prove that Theorem A implies Theorem A'.
Secondly, we prove that Theorem A' implies Theorem A.
The author thanks the referee for careful reading and useful comments. This article is supported by National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (10671117).
- Campi S, Gronchi P: The -Busemann-Petty centroid inequality. Advances in Mathematics 2002,167(1):128–141. 10.1006/aima.2001.2036MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Campi S, Gronchi P: On the reverse -Busemann-Petty centroid inequality. Mathematika 2002,49(1–2):1–11. 10.1112/S0025579300016004MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Lutwak E, Yang D, Zhang G: A new ellipsoid associated with convex bodies. Duke Mathematical Journal 2000,104(3):375–390. 10.1215/S0012-7094-00-10432-2MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Lutwak E, Yang D, Zhang G: affine isoperimetric inequalities. Journal of Differential Geometry 2000,56(1):111–132.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Lutwak E, Yang D, Zhang G: The Cramer-Rao inequality for star bodies. Duke Mathematical Journal 2002,112(1):59–81. 10.1215/S0012-9074-02-11212-5MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Lutwak E, Zhang G: Blaschke-Santaló inequalities. Journal of Differential Geometry 1997,47(1):1–16.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Werner E: The -affine surface area and geometric interpretations. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo 2002, 70: 367–382.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Lutwak E, Yang D, Zhang G: John ellipsoids. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 2005,90(2):497–520. 10.1112/S0024611504014996MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Yu W, Leng G, Wu D: Dual John ellipsoids. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society 2007,50(3):737–753.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Lu F, Leng G: Volume inequalities for -John ellipsoids and their duals. Glasgow Mathematical Journal 2007,49(3):469–477.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Lutwak E: The Brunn-Minkowski-Firey theory—I: mixed volumes and the Minkowski problem. Journal of Differential Geometry 1993,38(1):131–150.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Gardner RJ: Geometric Tomography, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications. Volume 58. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1995:xvi+424.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Schneider R: Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications. Volume 44. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1993:xiv+490.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.