Open Access

Generalized Lazarevic's Inequality and Its Applications—Part II

Journal of Inequalities and Applications20092009:379142

Received: 21 July 2009

Accepted: 30 November 2009

Published: 24 December 2009


A generalized Lazarevic's inequality is established. The applications of this generalized Lazarevic's inequality give some new lower bounds for logarithmic mean.

1. Introduction

Lazarević [1] (or see Mitrinović [2]) gives us the following result.

Theorem 1.1.

Let . Then

holds if and only if .

Recently, the author of this paper gives a new proof of the inequality (1.1) in [3] and extends the inequality (1.1) to the following result in [4].

Theorem 1.2.

Let , and . Then

holds if and only if .

Moreover, the inequality (1.1) can be extended as follows.

Theorem 1.3.

Let or , and . Then

holds if and only if .

2. Three Lemmas

Lemma 2.1 (see [58]).

Let be two continuous functions which are differentiable on . Further, let on . If is increasing (or decreasing) on , then the functions and are also increasing (or decreasing) on .

Lemma 2.2 (see [911]).

Let and be real numbers, and let the power series and be convergent for . If for and if is strictly increasing (or decreasing) for then the function is strictly increasing (or decreasing) on .

Lemma 2.3.

Let and . Then the function strictly increases as increases.

3. A Concise Proof of Theorem 1.3

Let , where , and . Then


where , and .

We compute




and .

We obtain results in two cases.
  1. (a)

    Let , then and . Let for we have that and is decreasing for so is decreasing for and is decreasing on by Lemma 2.2. Hence is decreasing on and is decreasing on by Lemma 2.1. Thus is decreasing on by Lemma 2.1.

  2. (b)

    Let , then . Let for we have that and is decreasing for so is decreasing for and is decreasing on by Lemma 2.2. Hence is increasing on and is decreasing on by Lemma 2.1. Thus is decreasing on by Lemma 2.1.




the proof of Theorem 1.3 is complete.

4. Some New Lower Bounds for Logarithmic Mean

Assuming that and are two different positive numbers, let , , and be the arithmetic, geometric, and logarithmic means, respectively. It is well known that (see [2, 1216])


Ostle and Terwilliger [17] (or see Leach and Sholander [18], Zhu [16]) gave bounds for in terms of and as follows:


Without loss of generality, let and , then . Replacing with in (1.3), we obtain the following new results for three classical means.

Theorem 4.1.

Let or , and and be two positive numbers such that . Then

holds if and only if .

Now letting in inequality (4.3) be , and , respectively, by Theorem 4.1 and Lemma 2.3 we have the following inequalities:


Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang Gongshang University


  1. Lazarević I: Neke nejednakosti sa hiperbolickim funkcijama. Univerzitet u Beogradu. Publikacije Elektrotehničkog Fakulteta. Serija Matematika i Fizika 1966, 170: 41–48.Google Scholar
  2. Mitrinović DS: Analytic Inequalities. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 1970:xii+400.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Zhu L: On Wilker-type inequalities. Mathematical Inequalities & Applications 2007,10(4):727–731.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhu L: Generalized Lazarevic's inequality and its applications—part I. submitted submittedGoogle Scholar
  5. Vamanamurthy MK, Vuorinen M: Inequalities for means. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1994,183(1):155–166. 10.1006/jmaa.1994.1137MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson GD, Qiu S-L, Vamanamurthy MK, Vuorinen M: Generalized elliptic integrals and modular equations. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 2000,192(1):1–37. 10.2140/pjm.2000.192.1MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Pinelis I: L'Hospital type results for monotonicity, with applications. Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics 2002,3(1, article 5):1–5.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Pinelis I: On L'Hospital-type rules for monotonicity. Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics 2006,7(2, article 40):1–19.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Biernacki M, Krzyż J: On the monotonity of certain functionals in the theory of analytic functions. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska 1955, 9: 135–147.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Ponnusamy S, Vuorinen M: Asymptotic expansions and inequalities for hypergeometric functions. Mathematika 1997,44(2):278–301. 10.1112/S0025579300012602MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Alzer H, Qiu S-L: Monotonicity theorems and inequalities for the complete elliptic integrals. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2004,172(2):289–312. 10.1016/ ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuang JC: Applied Inequalities. 3rd edition. Shangdong Science and Technology Press, Jinan City, China; 2004.Google Scholar
  13. Sándor J: On the identric and logarithmic means. Aequationes Mathematicae 1990,40(2–3):261–270.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Alzer H: Ungleichungen für Mittelwerte. Archiv der Mathematik 1986,47(5):422–426. 10.1007/BF01189983MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Stolarsky KB: The power and generalized logarithmic means. The American Mathematical Monthly 1980,87(7):545–548. 10.2307/2321420MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhu L: From chains for mean value inequalities to Mitrinovic's problem II. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 2005,36(1):118–125. 10.1080/00207390412331314971View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Ostle B, Terwilliger HL: A comparison of two means. Proceedings of the Montana Academy of Sciences 1957, 17: 69–70.Google Scholar
  18. Leach EB, Sholander MC: Extended mean values. II. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1983,92(1):207–223. 10.1016/0022-247X(83)90280-9MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar


© Ling Zhu. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.