 Research Article
 Open Access
 Published:
Subclasses of Meromorphic Functions Associated with Convolution
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volumeÂ 2009, ArticleÂ number:Â 190291 (2009)
Abstract
Several subclasses of meromorphic functions in the unit disk are introduced by means of convolution with a given fixed meromorphic function. Subjecting each convolutedderived function in the class to be subordinated to a given normalized convex function with positive real part, these subclasses extend the classical subclasses of meromorphic starlikeness, convexity, closetoconvexity, and quasiconvexity. Class relations, as well as inclusion and convolution properties of these subclasses, are investigated.
1. Introduction
Let be the set of all analytic functions defined in the unit disk . We denote by the class of normalized analytic functions defined in . For two functions and analytic in , the function is subordinate to , written as
if there exists a Schwarz function , analytic in with and such that In particular, if the function is univalent in , then is equivalent to and
A function is starlike if is subordinate to and convex if is subordinate to . Ma and Minda [1] gave a unified presentation of these classes and introduced the classes
where is an analytic function with positive real part, , and maps the unit disk onto a region starlike with respect to 1.
The convolution or the Hadamard product of two analytic functions and is given by
In term of convolution, a function is starlike if is starlike, and convex if is starlike. These ideas led to the study of the class of all functions such that is starlike for some fixed function in In this direction, Shanmugam [2] introduced and investigated various subclasses of analytic functions by using the convex hull method [3â€“5] and the method of differential subordination. Ravichandran [6] introduced certain classes of analytic functions with respect to ply symmetric points, conjugate points, and symmetric conjugate points, and also discussed their convolution properties. Some other related studies were also made in [7â€“9], and more recently by Shamani et al. [10].
Let denote the class of meromorphic functions of the form
which are analytic and univalent in the punctured unit disk . For we recall that the classes of meromorphic starlike, meromorphic convex, meromorphic closetoconvex, meromorphic convex (Mocanu sense), and meromorphic quasiconvex functions of order , denoted by , , , and respectively, are defined by
The convolution of two meromorphic functions and , where is given by (1.4) and , is given by
Motivated by the investigation of Shanmugam [2], Ravichandran [6], and Ali et al. [7, 11], several subclasses of meromorphic functions defined by means of convolution with a given fixed meromorphic function are introduced in Section 2. These new subclasses extend the classical classes of meromorphic starlike, convex, closetoconvex, convex, and quasiconvex functions given in (1.5). Section 3 is devoted to the investigation of the class relations as well as inclusion and convolution properties of these newly defined classes.
We will need the following definition and results to prove our main results.
Let denote the class of starlike functions of order . The class of prestarlike functions of order is defined by
for , and
Theorem 1.1 (see [12, Theorem 2.4]).
Let , , and . Then, for any analytic function ,
,
where denotes the closed convex hull of .
Theorem 1.2 (see [13]).
Let be convex in and with . If is analytic in with , then
2. Definitions
In this section, various subclasses of are defined by means of convolution and subordination. Let be a fixed function in , and let be a convex univalent function with positive real part in and .
Definition 2.1.
The class consists of functions satisfying in and the subordination
Remark 2.2.
If , then coincides with , where
Definition 2.3.
The class consists of functions satisfying in and the subordination
Definition 2.4.
The class consists of functions such that in for some and satisfying the subordination
Definition 2.5.
For real, the class consists of functions satisfying , in and the subordination
Definition 2.6.
The class consists of functions such that in for some and satisfying the subordination
3. Main Results
This section is devoted to the investigation of class relations as well as inclusion and convolution properties of the new subclasses given in Section 2.
Theorem 3.1.
Let be a convex univalent function satisfying , and with . If , then . Equivalently, if , then .
Proof.
Define the function by
For , it follows that
and therefore,
Hence . A computation shows that
Theorem 1.1 yields
and because , it follows that
Theorem 3.2.
The function if and only if
Proof.
The results follow from the equivalence relations
Theorem 3.3.
Let be a convex univalent function satisfying and with . If , then .
Proof.
Since , it follows that
and thus
Let
A similar computation as in the proof of Theorem 3.1 yields
Inequality (3.9) shows that . Therefore Theorem 1.1 yields
hence .
Corollary 3.4.
under the conditions of Theorem 3.3 .
Proof.
The proof follows from (3.12).
In particular, when , the following corollary is obtained.
Corollary 3.5.
Let and satisfy the conditions of Theorem 3.3 . If , then .
Theorem 3.6.
Let and satisfy the conditions of Theorem 3.3. If , then . Equivalently .
Proof.
If , it follows from Theorem 3.2 that . Theorem 3.3 shows that Hence .
Theorem 3.7.
Under the conditions of Theorem 3.3, if with respect to , then with respect to .
Proof.
Theorem 3.3 shows that . Since , (3.9) yields .
Let the function be defined by
A similar computation as in the proof of Theorem 3.1 yields
Since and , it follows from Theorem 1.1 that
Thus with respect to .
Corollary 3.8.
under the assumptions of Theorem 3.3 .
Proof.
The subordination (3.15) shows that .
Theorem 3.9.
Let . Then
(i),
(ii) for .
Proof.
Define the function by
and the function by
For , it follows that Note also that

(i)
Since and
(3.19)
Theorem 1.2 yields Hence .

(ii)
Observe that
(3.20)
Furthermore and from (i). Since and is convex, we deduce that . Therefore,
Corollary 3.10.
The class is a subset of the class
Proof.
The proof follows from the definition of the classes by taking .
Theorem 3.11.
The function if and only if .
Proof.
If , then there exists such that
Also,
Since , by Theorem 3.2 , . Hence .
Conversely, if , then
for some . Let be such that . The proof is completed by observing that
Corollary 3.12.
Let and satisfy the conditions of Theorem 3.3 . If , then
Proof.
If , Theorem 3.11 gives Theorem 3.7 next gives Thus, Theorem 3.11 yields
Corollary 3.13.
under the conditions of Theorem 3.3.
Proof.
If , it follows from Corollary 3.12 that The subordination
gives . Therefore
Open Problem
An analytic convex function in the unit disk is necessarily starlike. For the meromorphic case, is it true that ?
References
Ma WC, Minda D: A unified treatment of some special classes of univalent functions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Complex Analysis (Tianjin, 1992), 1994, Cambridge, Mass, USA, Conference Proceedings and Lecture Notes in Analysis, I. International Press; 157â€“169.
Shanmugam TN: Convolution and differential subordination. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 1989,12(2):333â€“340. 10.1155/S0161171289000384
Barnard RW, Kellogg C: Applications of convolution operators to problems in univalent function theory. The Michigan Mathematical Journal 1980,27(1):81â€“94.
Parvatham R, Radha S: On starlike and closetoconvex functions with respect to symmetric points. Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1986,17(9):1114â€“1122.
Ruscheweyh S, SheilSmall T: Hadamard products of Schlicht functions and the PÃ³lyaSchoenberg conjecture. Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 1973, 48: 119â€“135. 10.1007/BF02566116
Ravichandran V: Functions starlike with respect to ply symmetric, conjugate and symmetric conjugate points. The Journal of the Indian Academy of Mathematics 2004,26(1):35â€“45.
Ali RM, Ravichandran V, Lee SK: Subclasses of multivalent starlike and convex functions. to appear in Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society. Simon Stevin to appear in Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society. Simon Stevin
Padmanabhan KS, Parvatham R: Some applications of differential subordination. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society 1985,32(3):321â€“330. 10.1017/S0004972700002410
Padmanabhan KS, Parvatham R: Some applications of differential subordination. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society 1985,32(3):321â€“330. 10.1017/S0004972700002410
Shamani S, Ali RM, Ravichandran V, Lee SK: Convolution and differential subordination for multivalent functions. to appear in Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society. Second Series to appear in Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society. Second Series
Ali RM, Ravichandran V, Seenivasagan N: Subordination and superordination of the LiuSrivastava linear operator on meromorphic functions. Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society. Second Series 2008,31(2):193â€“207.
Ruscheweyh S: Convolutions in Geometric Function Theory: Fundamental Theories of Physics, SÃ©minaire de MathÃ©matiques SupÃ©rieures. Volume 83. Presses de l'UniversitÃ© de MontrÃ©al, Montreal, Canada; 1982:168.
Eenigenburg P, Miller SS, Mocanu PT, Reade MO: On a BriotBouquet differential subordination. Revue Roumaine de MathÃ©matiques Pures et AppliquÃ©es 1984,29(7):567â€“573.
Acknowledgment
The work presented here was supported in part by the USM's Reserach University grant and the FRGS grant
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Haji Mohd, M., Ali, R.M., Keong, L.S. et al. Subclasses of Meromorphic Functions Associated with Convolution. J Inequal Appl 2009, 190291 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/190291
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/190291
Keywords
 Analytic Function
 Unit Disk
 Meromorphic Function
 Conjugate Point
 Class Relation