Open Access

On a Converse of Jensen's Discrete Inequality

Journal of Inequalities and Applications20092009:153080

Received: 10 July 2009

Accepted: 6 December 2009

Published: 15 December 2009


We give the best possible global bounds for a form of discrete Jensen's inequality. By some examples the fruitfulness of this result is shown.

1. Introduction

Throughout this paper represents a finite sequence of real numbers belonging to a fixed closed interval , and is a positive weight sequence associated with .

If is a convex function on , then the well-known Jensen's inequality [1, 2] asserts that

There are many important inequalities which are particular cases of Jensen's inequality among which are the weighted inequality, Cauchy's inequality, the Ky Fan and Hölder's inequalities.

One can see that the lower bound zero is of global nature since it does not depend on but only on and the interval whereupon is convex.

We give in [1] an upper global bound (i.e., depending on and only) which happens to be better than already existing ones. Namely, we prove that
Note that, for a (strictly) positive convex function , Jensen's inequality can also be stated in the form

It is not difficult to prove that is the best possible global lower bound for Jensen's inequality written in the above form. Our aim in this paper is to find the best possible global upper bound for (1.4). We will show with examples that by following this approach one may consequently obtain converses of some important inequalities.

2. Results

Our main result is contained in what follows.

Theorem 2.1.

Let be a (strictly) positive, twice continuously differentiable function on , and . One has that

(i)if is (strictly) convex function on , then
(ii)if is (strictly) concave function on , then

Both estimates are independent of .

The next assertion shows that (resp., ) exists and is unique.

Theorem 2.2.

There is unique such that

Of particular importance is the following theorem.

Theorem 2.3.

The expression represents the best possible global upper bound for Jensen's inequality written in the form (1.4).

3. Proofs

We will give proofs of the previous assertions related to the first part of Theorem 2.1. Proofs concerning concave functions go along the same lines.

Proof of Theorem 2.1.

We apply the method already shown in [1]. Namely, since , there is a sequence such that .

Denoting , we get

Proof of Theorem 2.2.

For fixed , denote
We get with

Since is strictly convex on and , we conclude that is monotone decreasing on with . Since is continuous, there exists unique such that . Also , showing that is attained at the point . The proof is completed.

Proof of Theorem 2.3.

Let be an arbitrary global upper bound. By definition, the inequality

holds for arbitrary and .

In particular, for we obtain that as required.

4. Applications

In the sequel we will give some examples to demonstrate the fruitfulness of the assertions from Theorem 2.1. Since all bounds will be given as a combination of means from the Stolarsky class, here is its definition.

Stolarsky (or extended) two-parametric mean values are defined for positive values of as
means can be continuously extended on the domain
by the following:

and this form is introduced by Stolarsky in [3].

Most of the classical two variable means are special cases of the class . For example, is the arithmetic mean ,   is the geometric mean ,   is the logarithmic mean ,   is the identric mean , and so forth. More generally, the th power mean is equal to .

Example 4.1.

Taking , after an easy calculation it follows that . Therefore we consequently obtain the result.

Proposition 4.2.

If , then the inequality

holds for an arbitrary weight sequence .

This is the extended form of Schweitzer inequality.

Example 4.3.

For we get that the maximum of is attained at the point .

Hence, we have the following.

Proposition 4.4.

If , then the following means inequality

holds for an arbitrary weight sequence .

As a special case of the above inequality, that is, by putting and noting that imply , we obtain a converse of the well-known Cauchy's inequality.

Proposition 4.5.

If , then

In this form the Cauchy's inequality was stated in [2, page 80].

Note that the same result can be obtained from inequality (4.4) by taking .

Example 4.6.

Let . Since in this case is a concave function, applying the second part of Theorem 2.1, we get the following.

Proposition 4.7.

If , then

independently of .

In the limiting cases we obtain two important converses. Namely, writing (4.7) as

and, letting , the converse of generalized inequality arises.

Proposition 4.8.

If , then

Note that the right-hand side of (4.9) is exactly the Specht ratio (cf. [1]).

Analogously, writing (4.7) in the form

and taking the limit , one has the following.

Proposition 4.9.

If , then

Finally, putting in (4.7) , we obtain the converse of discrete Hölder's inequality.

Proposition 4.10.

If , then

It is interesting to compare (4.12) with the converse of Hölder's inequality for integral forms (cf. [4]).

Authors’ Affiliations

Mathematical Institute SANU


  1. Simic S: On an upper bound for Jensen's inequality. Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics 2009,10(2, article 60):-5.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Polya G, Szego G: Aufgaben und Lehrsatze aus der Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Germany; 1964.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Stolarsky KB: Generalizations of the logarithmic mean. Mathematics Magazine 1975,48(2):87–92. 10.2307/2689825MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Saitoh S, Tuan VK, Yamamoto M: Reverse weighted L p norm inequalities in convolutions. Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics 2000,1(1, article 7):-7.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar


© Slavko Simic. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.