- Research Article
- Open access
- Published:
Trace Inequalities for Matrix Products and Trace Bounds for the Solution of the Algebraic Riccati Equations
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2009, Article number: 101085 (2009)
Abstract
By using diagonalizable matrix decomposition and majorization inequalities, we propose new trace bounds for the product of two real square matrices in which one is diagonalizable. These bounds improve and extend the previous results. Furthermore, we give some trace bounds for the solution of the algebraic Riccati equations, which improve some of the previous results under certain conditions. Finally, numerical examples have illustrated that our results are effective and superior.
1. Introduction
As we all know, the Riccati equations are of great importance in both theory and practice in the analysis and design of controllers and filters for linear dynamical systems (see [1–5]). For example, consider the following linear system (see [5]):
with the cost
The optimal control rate the optimal cost of (1.1) and (1.2) are
where is the initial state of system (1.1) and (1.2) and is the positive semidefinite solution of the following algebraic Riccati equation (ARE):
with and being positive definite and positive semidefinite matrices, respectively. To guarantee the existence of the positive definite solution to (1.4), we will make the following assumptions: the pair is stabilizable, and the pair is observable.
In practice, it is hard to solve the ARE, and there is no general method unless the system matrices are special and there are some methods and algorithms to solve (1.4); however, the solution can be time-consuming and computationally difficult, particularly as the dimensions of the system matrices increase. Thus, a number of works have been presented by researchers to evaluate the bounds and trace bounds for the solution of the ARE (see [6–16]). Moreover, in terms of [2, 6], we know that an interpretation of is that is the average value of the optimal cost as varies over the surface of a unit sphere. Therefore, considering its applications, it is important to discuss trace bounds for the product of two matrices. In symmetric case, a number of works have been proposed for the trace of matrix products ([2, 6–8, 17–20]), and [18] is the tightest among the parallel results.
In 1995, Lasserre showed [18] the following given any matrix then the following.
where .
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we propose new trace bounds for the product of two general matrices. The new trace bounds improve the previous results. Then, we present some trace bounds for the solution of the algebraic Riccati equations, which improve some of the previous results under certain conditions in Section 3. In Section 4, we give numerical examples to demonstrate the effectiveness of our results. Finally, we get conclusions in Section 5.
2. Trace Inequalities for Matrix Products
In the following, let denote the set of real matrices and let denote the subset of consisting of symmetric matrices. For , we assume that , denote the trace, the inverse, the transpose, the diagonal elements, the singular values of , respectively, and define . If is an arbitrary symmetric matrix, then and denote the eigenvalues and the real part of eigenvalues of . Suppose is a real -element array such as which is reordered, and its elements are arranged in nonincreasing order; that is, . The notation () is used to denote that is a symmetric positive definite (semidefinite) matrix.
Let be two real -element arrays. If they satisfy
then it is said that is controlled weakly by , which is signed by .
If and
then it is said that is controlled by , which is signed by .
The following lemmas are used to prove the main results.
Lemma 2.1 (see [21, Page 92, H.2.c]).
If and , then for any real array ,
Lemma 2.2 (see [21, Page 218, B.1]).
Let , then
Lemma 2.3 (see [21, Page 240, F.4.a]).
Let , then
Lemma 2.4 (see [22]).
Let , then
where
Note that if or , obviously, (2.6) holds. If , choose , then (2.6) also holds.
Remark 2.5.
If , then we obtain Cauchy-Schwarz inequality:
where
Remark 2.6.
Note that
Let in (2.6), then we obtain
Lemma 2.7.
If , , then
Proof.
() Note that for , or ,
 () If , , for , choose , then and . Thus, is a convex function. As and , from the property of the convex function, we have
 () If , without loss of generality, we may assume . Then from (), we have
Since , thus
This completes the proof.
Theorem 2.8.
Let , and let be diagonalizable with the following decomposition:
where is nonsingular. Then
Proof.
Note that is real; by the matrix theory we have
Since , without loss of generality, we may assume . Next, we will prove the left-hand side of (2.18):
If
then we obtain the conclusion. Now assume that there exists such that then
We use to denote the vector of after changing and , then
After a limited number of steps, we obtain the left-hand side of (2.18). For the right-hand side of (2.18)
If
then we obtain the conclusion. Now assume that there exists such that then
We use to denote the vector of after changing and , then
After a limited number of steps, we obtain the right-hand side of (2.18). Therefore, we have
Since applying (2.18) with in lieu of we immediately have the following corollary.
Corollary 2.9.
Let , and let be diagonalizable with the following decomposition:
where is nonsingular. Then
Theorem 2.10.
Let , be normal. Then
Proof.
Since is normal, from [23, page 101, Theorem ], we have
where is orthogonal. Since and , then for , we have
In terms of Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2, (2.18) implies
This completes the proof.
Note that if , , then from (2.34) we obtain (1.5) immediately. This implies that (2.18) improves (1.5).
Since applying (2.31) with in lieu of we immediately have the following corollary.
Corollary 2.11.
Let , be normal, then
3. Trace Bounds for the Solution of the Algebraic Riccati Equations
Komaroff (1994) in [16] obtained the following. Let be the positive semidefinite solution of the ARE (1.4). Then the trace of has the upper bound given by
where
In this section, by appling our new trace bounds in Section 2, we obtain some lower trace bounds for the solution of the algebraic Riccati equations. Furthermore, we obtain some upper trace bounds which improve (3.1) under certain conditions.
Theorem 3.1.
If , and is the positive semidefinite solution of the ARE (1.4).
There are both, upper and lower, bounds:
If , then the trace of has the lower and upper bounds given by
where denotes and denotes
If , then the trace of has the lower and upper bounds given by
where ,
We have
Proof.
() Multiply (1.4) on the right and on the left by to get
where . Take the trace of all terms in (3.6) to get
Since is positive semidefiniteness, , and from Lemma 2.7, we have
By Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (2.8), it can be shown that
Since are positive semidefiniteness, is positive definiteness, then by (1.5), note that for , , and considering (2.6), (3.8), and (3.9), we have
Note that , , then from (1.5) we have
Combining (3.11) with (3.12), we obtain
Solving (3.13) for yields the left-hand side of (3.2).
Since are positive semidefiniteness, is positive definiteness, then by (1.5), note that for , , and considering (2.6), (3.8), and (3.10), we have
Combining (3.12) with (3.14), we obtain
Solving (3.15) for yields the right-hand side of (3.2).
() Note that when , by (1.5), (2.6), and (3.8), we have
Combining (3.11) with (3.16), we obtain
Solving (3.17) for yields the left-hand side of (3.3).
By (1.5), (2.6), and (3.8), we have
Combining (3.14) with (3.18), we obtain
Solving (3.19) for yields the right-hand side of (3.3).
() Note that when , by (3.3), we obtain (3.4) immediately. This completes the proof.
Remark 3.2.
From Remark 2.6 and Theorem 3.1, we have the following results.
() Let in (3.2), then we have
() Let in (3.3), then we obtain (3.20).
() Let in (3.4). Note that when ,
Then we can also obtain (3.20).
Note that the right-hand side of (3.20) is (3.1), which implies that Theorem 3.1 improves (3.1).
4. Numerical Examples
In this section, firstly, we will give an example to illustrate that our new trace bounds are better than those of the recent results. Then, to illustrate that the application in the algebraic Riccati equations of our results will have different superiority if we choose different and , we will give two examples.
Example 4.1.
Let
Then and is symmetric. Using (1.5) yields
Using (2.18) yields
where both lower and upper bounds are better than those of the main result of [18], that is, (1.5).
Example 4.2.
Consider the system (1.1), (1.2) with
and consider the corresponding ARE (1.4) with ; is stabilizable and is observable. Using (3.20) yields
Using (3.2), when , then we obtain
where the upper bound is better than that of the main result of [16], that is, (3.1).
Example 4.3.
Consider the system (1.1), (1.2) with
and consider the corresponding ARE (1.4) with ; is stabilizable and is observable. Using (3.2), when , then we obtain
Using (3.20) yields
where the lower and upper bounds are better than those of (4.8).
5. Conclusions
In this paper, we have proposed lower and upper bounds for the trace of the product of two real square matrices in which one is diagonalizable. We have shown that our bounds for the trace are the tightest among the parallel trace bounds in symmetric case. Then, we have obtained some trace bounds for the solution of the algebraic Riccati equations, which improve some of the previous results under certain conditions. Finally, numerical examples have illustrated that our bounds are better than those of the previous results.
References
Kwakernaak K, Sivan R: Linear Optimal Control Systems. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 1972.
Kleinman DL, Athans M: The design of suboptimal linear time-varying systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1968, 13: 150–159. 10.1109/TAC.1968.1098852
Davies R, Shi P, Wiltshire R: New upper solution bounds for perturbed continuous algebraic Riccati equations applied to automatic control. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 2007,32(2):487–495. 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.06.096
Ogata K: Modern Control Engineering. 3rd edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA; 1997.
Ni M-L: Existence condition on solutions to the algebraic Riccati equation. Acta Automatica Sinica 2008,34(1):85–87.
Wang SD, Kuo T-S, Hsü C: Trace bounds on the solution of the algebraic matrix Riccati and Lyapunov equation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1986,31(7):654–656. 10.1109/TAC.1986.1104370
Saniuk JM, Rhodes IB: A matrix inequality associated with bounds on solutions of algebraic Riccati and Lyapunov equations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1987, 32: 739–740. 10.1109/TAC.1987.1104700
Mori T: Comments on A matrix inequality associated with bounds on solutions of algebraic Riccati and Lyapunov equations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1988, 33: 1088–1091. 10.1109/9.14428
Kang T, Kim BS, Lee JG: Spectral norm and trace bounds of algebraic matrix Riccati equations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1996,41(12):1828–1830. 10.1109/9.545751
Kwon WH, Moon YS, Ahn SC: Bounds in algebraic Riccati and Lyapunov equations: a survey and some new results. International Journal of Control 1996,64(3):377–389. 10.1080/00207179608921634
Kim SW, Park PG: Matrix bounds of the discrete ARE solution. Systems & Control Letters 1999,36(1):15–20. 10.1016/S0167-6911(98)00061-9
Kouikoglou VS, Tsourveloudis NC: Eigenvalue bounds on the solutions of coupled Lyapunov and Riccati equations. Linear Algebra and Its Applications 1996, 235: 247–259.
Lee C-H: Eigenvalue upper bounds of the solution of the continuous Riccati equation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1997,42(9):1268–1271. 10.1109/9.623090
Lee C-H: New results for the bounds of the solution for the continuous Riccati and Lyapunov equations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1997,42(1):118–123. 10.1109/9.553695
Lee C-H: On the upper and lower bounds of the solution for the continuous Riccati matrix equation. International Journal of Control 1997,66(1):105–118. 10.1080/002071797224847
Komaroff N: Diverse bounds for the eigenvalues of the continuous algebraic Riccati equation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1994,39(3):532–534. 10.1109/9.280751
Fang YG, Loparo KA, Feng X: Inequalities for the trace of matrix product. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1994,39(12):2489–2490. 10.1109/9.362841
Lasserre JB: A trace inequality for matrix product. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1995,40(8):1500–1501. 10.1109/9.402252
Park P: On the trace bound of a matrix product. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1996,41(12):1799–1802. 10.1109/9.545717
Lasserre JB: Tight bounds for the trace of a matrix product. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1997,42(4):578–581. 10.1109/9.566673
Marshall AW, Olkin I: Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications, Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Volume 143. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA; 1979:xx+569.
Wang CL: On development of inverses of the Cauchy and Hölder inequalities. SIAM Review 1979,21(4):550–557. 10.1137/1021096
Horn RA, Johnson CR: Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1986.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Professor Jozef Banas and the referees for the very helpful comments and suggestions to improve the contents and presentation of this paper. The work was also supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (10971176).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J., Zhang, J. & Liu, Y. Trace Inequalities for Matrix Products and Trace Bounds for the Solution of the Algebraic Riccati Equations. J Inequal Appl 2009, 101085 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/101085
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/101085