Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between SALM and SSALM for \(p=0.5\)

From: A semi-smoothing augmented Lagrange multiplier algorithm for low-rank Toeplitz matrix completion

n

rank(M)

Algorithm

IT

time (s)

error 1

error 2

500

10

SALM

44

2.8955

9.5801e−10

2.2756e−08

SSALM

44

2.1933

4.4278e−10

2.3334e−09

800

10

SALM

56

8.6741

7.0000e−10

2.6659e−06

SSALM

52

5.4772

9.2740e−10

3.3480e−09

1000

10

SALM

60

11.0450

8.2993e−10

6.6858e−08

SSALM

56

6.7779

8.6651e−10

1.8478e−09

1500

10

SALM

68

20.6328

8.45398e−10

9.6939e−07

SSALM

64

15.6997

9.3584e−10

1.5261e−09

2000

10

SALM

71

44.8591

9.9033e−10

7.2479e−08

SSALM

68

27.9845

9.6632e−10

2.8679e−09

2500

10

SALM

78

67.4042

7.3828e−10

1.2312e−07

SSALM

74

45.3268

7.1109e−10

2.5905e−09

3000

10

SALM

77

74.2323

7.2763e−10

9.9884e−09

SSALM

76

64.4300

8.2104e−10

1.2376e−08

4000

20

SALM

73

155.9955

9.4452e−10

1.8879e−06

SSALM

72

128.0443

7.1470e−10

1.8278e−09

5000

20

SALM

74

235.1514

9.1421e−10

7.9369e−06

SSALM

76

200.7122

6.2859e−10

3.5799e−09

8000

25

SALM

80

622.5518

9.5065e−10

5.5408e−06

SSALM

80

498.8602

5.1021e−10

3.0270e−08