Table 4 Comparison of Algorithm 3.2 with those of Sitthithakerngkiet et al. [23] and Kazmi et al. [29]
From: New inertial algorithm for solving split common null point problem in Banach spaces
K, m and n | DOL | Method | Step size | Iter (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
K = 50, m = 210, n = 212 | 10−6 | Algorithm 3.2 | \(\lambda _{n}\) | 1881 |
Sitthithakerngkiet et al. [23] | 0.05 | 3262 | ||
Kazmi et al. [29] | 0.05 | 28,674 | ||
K = 40, m = 210, n = 212 | 10−6 | Algorithm 3.2 | \(\lambda _{n}\) | 1779 |
Sitthithakerngkiet et al. [23] | 0.05 | 2942 | ||
Kazmi et al. [29] | 0.05 | 26,488 | ||
K = 20, m = 210, n = 212 | 10−6 | Algorithm 3.2 | \(\lambda _{n}\) | 1496 |
Sitthithakerngkiet et al. [23] | 0.05 | 2094 | ||
Kazmi et al. [29] | 0.05 | 19,488 |