Table 2 The comparison of GNM, GTM and TSI in Example 2
From: A new two-step iterative method for solving absolute value equations
Dim | GNM | GTM | TSI | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K | ACC | T | K | ACC | T | K | ACC | T | |
100 | 3 | 5.8699 × 10−12 | 0.0052 | 3 | 3.0920 × 10−13 | 0.0080 | 3 | 3.0515 × 10−13 | 0.0064 |
200 | 3 | 8.7417 × 10−11 | 0.0171 | 3 | 8.5750 × 10−13 | 0.0175 | 3 | 8.3127 × 10−13 | 0.0204 |
300 | 3 | 2.0700 × 10−10 | 0.0508 | 3 | 1.5518 × 10−12 | 0.0578 | 3 | 1.6336 × 10−12 | 0.0467 |
400 | 3 | 4.2251 × 10−10 | 0.1011 | 3 | 2.5566 × 10−12 | 0.1143 | 3 | 2.5549 × 10−12 | 0.1314 |
500 | 4 | 5.2788 × 10−10 | 0.1959 | 4 | 3.5830 × 10−12 | 0.2092 | 4 | 3.5426 × 10−12 | 0.2462 |
600 | 4 | 3.0194 × 10−10 | 0.3553 | 4 | 4.7330 × 10−12 | 0.3736 | 4 | 4.7270 × 10−12 | 0.5042 |
700 | 4 | 7.0378 × 10−10 | 0.5615 | 4 | 6.0018 × 10−12 | 0.5323 | 4 | 5.8574 × 10−12 | 0.7583 |
800 | 4 | 1.0602 × 10−10 | 0.8279 | 5 | 7.6437 × 10−12 | 0.8035 | 5 | 6.7769 × 10−12 | 0.8134 |
900 | 5 | 2.8031 × 10−9 | 1.6159 | 5 | 8.8566 × 10−12 | 1.4304 | 5 | 8.4667 × 10−12 | 1.4072 |
1000 | 5 | 3.5603 × 10−9 | 2.3006 | 5 | 1.0776 × 10−11 | 1.9268 | 5 | 9.9720 × 10−12 | 1.8344 |