Table 1 The comparison of GNM, GTM and TSI in Example 1
From: A new two-step iterative method for solving absolute value equations
Dim | GNM | GTM | TSI | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K | ACC | T | K | ACC | T | K | ACC | T | |
100 | 3 | 6.6601 × 10−12 | 0.0036 | 3 | 7.3677 × 10−13 | 0.0069 | 3 | 4.4030 × 10−13 | 0.0122 |
200 | 3 | 1.0395 × 10−10 | 0.0145 | 3 | 2.2623 × 10−12 | 0.0121 | 3 | 1.0761 × 10−12 | 0.0313 |
300 | 3 | 2.9896 × 10−10 | 0.0432 | 3 | 2.8670 × 10−12 | 0.0611 | 3 | 1.2862 × 10−12 | 0.0943 |
400 | 3 | 6.1301 × 10−10 | 0.8682 | 3 | 5.8058 × 10−12 | 0.0075 | 3 | 1.4559 × 10−12 | 0.1137 |
500 | 3 | 1.3574 × 10−10 | 0.1498 | 3 | 6.1348 × 10−12 | 0.1355 | 3 | 1.6708 × 10−12 | 0.1850 |
600 | 3 | 4.3000 × 10−9 | 0.2231 | 3 | 7.8633 × 10−12 | 0.2702 | 3 | 3.6379 × 10−12 | 0.2897 |
700 | 3 | 1.2489 × 10−9 | 0.5052 | 3 | 7.8369 × 10−12 | 0.2932 | 3 | 4.2171 × 10−12 | 0.4356 |
800 | 3 | 3.9699 × 10−9 | 0.8166 | 4 | 1.6596 × 10−11 | 0.4496 | 3 | 4.3618 × 10−12 | 0.6221 |
900 | 3 | 5.7449 × 10−9 | 1.1213 | 4 | 1.7759 × 10−11 | 0.7850 | 3 | 4.5474 × 10−12 | 0.8392 |
1000 | 3 | 6.5951 × 10−9 | 1.5295 | 4 | 1.7845 × 10−11 | 0.9808 | 3 | 5.4310 × 10−12 | 1.0813 |