Skip to main content

Table 1 Numerical comparisons for test Examples 16

From: An accelerating algorithm for globally solving nonconvex quadratic programming

E.g.

Methods

Opt. val.

Opt. sol.

Iter.

Time (s)

1

ours

10.00000

(2.0000, 8.0000)

3

0.35725

[25]

10.0000090

(1.9999998, 7.9999988)

41

0.02

[26]

10

(2, 8)

27

10.83

[27]

10

(2, 8)

53

0.3

2

ours

3.00000

(0.0000, 4.0000)

8

0.01791

[28]

3.00000

(0.0000, 4.0000)

25

0.750

3

ours

0.890185

(1.3148, 0.1396, 0.0, 0.4233)

1

0.38982

[27]

0.8902

(1.3148, 0.1396, 0.0, 0.4233)

1

0.1880

[29]

0.890193

(1.314792, 0.13955, 0.0, 0.423286)

6

 

4

ours

−16.22662

(0.0, 3.6403, 0.0, 2.9029, 1.9388, 0.0)

5

0.59005

5

ours

−3.00000

(3.0000, 3.0000)

30

4.15970

6

ours

−1.06250

(0.7500, 2.0000)

3

0.26845