Skip to main content

Table 1 The numerical results of Example 4.1

From: Iterative process for solving a multiple-set split feasibility problem

Case

Censor

γ  = 1

Algo. 3.1

γ  = 1

\(\boldsymbol {t_{k}=0.1}\)

Censor

γ  = 0.6

Algo. 3.1

γ  = 0.6

\(\boldsymbol {t_{k}=0.1} \)

Censor

γ  = 1.8

Algo. 3.1

γ  = 1.8

\(\boldsymbol {t_{k}=0.1}\)

I

\(\mathrm{Iter.}=1{,}051\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}=1.043\)

\(\mathrm{Iter.}=146\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.} =0.401\)

\(\mathrm{Iter.}=1{,}867\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}=1.480\)

\(\mathrm{Iter.}=224\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}=0.334\)

\(\mathrm{Iter.}=832\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}=0.700\)

\(\mathrm{Iter.}= 89\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}=0.062\)

II

\(\mathrm{Iter.}= 197\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}= 0.320\)

\(\mathrm{Iter.}=28\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}=0.017\)

\(\mathrm{Iter.}=289\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}=0.466\)

\(\mathrm{Iter.}=62\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}=0.0751\)

\(\mathrm{Iter.}=87\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}=0.068\)

\(\mathrm{Iter.}=9\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}=0.010\)

III

\(\mathrm{Iter.}=207\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}= 0.360\)

\(\mathrm{Iter.}=62\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}=0.049\)

\(\mathrm{Iter.}=362\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}=0.551\)

\(\mathrm{Iter.}= 67\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}=0.0728\)

\(\mathrm{Iter.}=139\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}=0.217\)

\(\mathrm{Iter.}=17\)

\(\mathrm{Sec.}=0.020\)