- Research
- Open access
- Published:
On a half-discrete inequality with a generalized homogeneous kernel
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2012, Article number: 30 (2012)
Abstract
By introducing a real number homogeneous kernel and estimating the weight function through the real function techniques, a half-discrete inequality with a best constant factor is established. In addition, the operator expressions, equivalent forms, reverse inequalities and some particular cases are given.
Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 26D15.
1. Introduction
One hundred years ago, Hilbert proved the following classic inequality [1]
During the past century, ever since the advent the inequality (1.1), numerous related results have been obtained. The inequality (1.1) may be classified into several types (discrete and integral etc.), being the following integral form:
If f, g are real functions such that , then we have [1]
where the constant factor π is the best possible. Inequality (1.2) had been generalized by Hardy-Riesz in 1925 as [1]:
If p > 1, such that , then
where the constant factor is the best possible. Inequality (1.3) is named as Hardy-Hilbert's integral inequality, which is of great importance in analysis and its applications [2–4]. Its generalization can be seen in [5–11].
Until now, we only studied the related inequalities with pure discrete or integral inequalities, but half-discrete inequality is very rare in the literature [12–14]. Now we attempt investigation for it, lots of related results will appear in the coming future.
The main purpose of this article is to establish a half-discrete inequality with the mixed homogeneous kernel of real number degree. For example: If , then
where α = λ1 + λ2, 0 <λ1 <α and the constant factor is the best possible. Meanwhile, the extended inequality, operator expressions, reverse inequality, and equivalent forms are given. We hope this work will expand our understanding of inequality and the scope of the study.
2. Lemmas
LEMMA 2.1. Let α, β ∈ ℝ and λ1 + λ2 = α - β, -β <λ1 <α, λ2 ≤ 1 - β, define the weight function and the weight coefficient as follows
then
where
Proof. For fixed n, let , substituting into ω(n) gives
In view of λ2 ≤ 1 - β, α - λ2 = β + λ1 > 0, for fixed x > 0, the function
is monotonically decreasing with respect to y, then
where . If x ∈ (0,1), then
if x ∈ [1,∞), then
Thus (2.3) is valid.
In what follows, α, β will be real numbers such that λ1 + λ2 = α - β, -β <λ1 <α, λ2 ≤ 1 - β.
LEMMA 2.2. Suppose that p > 0(p ≠ 1), , a n ≥ 0, f(x) is a non-negative measurable function in (0, ∞), then
(a) if p > 1, then the following two inequalities hold:
(b) if 0 <p < 1, then we have
Proof. (a) Using Hölder's inequality with weight [15] and (2.3) gives
Hence (2.4) is valid. By similar reasoning to the above it may be shown that
Thus (2.5) is valid.
-
(b)
Similarly, using the reverse Hölder's inequality with weight [15] and (2.3) gives (2.6) and (2.7).
LEMMA 2.3. Suppose that 0 <q < 1, , a n ≥ 0, f(x) is a non-negative measurable function in (0, ∞), then (Let J, L be as in Lemma 2.2)
Proof. Applying Hölder's inequality [15] and (2.3), where p < 0 gives
Hence (2.10) is valid. By similar reasoning to the above, in view of 0 <q < 1, it may be shown that
Thus (2.11) is valid.
3. Main results
THEOREM 3.1. If p > 1, , a n ≥ 0, f(x) ≥ 0 such thatand, then we have the following equivalent inequalities
where the constant factor, are the best possible.
Proof. Using Lebesgue term-by-term integration theorem, there are two forms of I of (3.1). In view of , (2.8) takes the strict inequality, thus (3.1) is valid. On one hand, using Hölder's inequality [15] gives
By (3.2), (3.1) is valid. On the other hand, suppose that (3.1) is valid. Let
then from (3.1), it follows
By (2.8) and the conditions, it follows that J < ∞. If J = 0, then (3.2) is naturally valid. If J > 0, in view of the conditions of (3.1), then (3.5) takes the strict inequality, and
Hence (3.2) is valid, which is equivalent to (3.1).
On one hand, in view of the conditions, (2.9) takes the strict inequality, thus (3.3) is valid. Using Hölder's inequality [15] gives
By (3.3), (3.1) is valid. On the other hand, suppose that (3.1) is valid. Let
Applying (3.1) gives
By (2.9) and the conditions, it follows that L < ∞. If L = 0, then (3.3) is naturally valid. If L > 0, in view of the conditions of (3.1), then (3.7) takes the strict inequality, and
Hence (3.3) is valid, which is equivalent to (3.1). Thus (3.1), (3.2), and (3.3) are equivalent to each other.
For any 0 <ε <qλ2, suppose that and . Assuming there exists a positive number k with , such that (3.1) is still valid by changing to k. In particular, on one hand,
On the other hand, by monotonicity and Fubini theorem, it follows that
Applying (3.8) and (3.9) gives
Using Fatou theorem gives
Hence is the best constant factor of (3.1). It is obvious that the constant factor in (3.2) (or (3.3)) is the best possible. Otherwise, by (3.4) (or (3.6)), we may get a contradiction that the constant factor in (3.1) is not the best possible. This completes the proof.
Remark 1. Let , x ∈ (0,∞) and , n ∈ ℕ+, then .
-
(i)
A half-discrete Hilbert's operator is defined by:
where . Then by (3.2), it follows that: , i.e., T is a bounded operator with . Since the constant factor in (3.2) is the best possible, we have .
-
(ii)
Similarly, another half-discrete Hilbert's operator is defined by:
where . Then by (3.3), it follows that: . In another word, T is a bounded operator with . Since the constant factor in (3.3) is the best possible, we obtain .
THEOREM 3.2. If 0 <p < 1, , a n ≥ 0, f(x) ≥ 0 such thatand, then we have the following equivalent inequalities (Let I, J be as in Theorem 3.1)
where the constant factor are the best possible.
Proof. Similar to (2.8), by the reverse Hölder's inequality [15], (2.3) and the conditions, we have
thus (2.11) is valid. On one hand, by the reverse Hölder's inequality [15], we obtain the reverse form of (3.4) as follows
by (3.11), (3.10) is valid. On the other hand, suppose that (3.10) is valid. Let
Applying (3.10) gives
By (3.13) and the conditions, it follows that J > 0. If J = ∞, then (3.11) is naturally valid. If J < ∞, in view of the conditions and (3.10), then (3.15) takes the strict inequality, and
Hence (3.11) is valid, which is equivalent to (3.10).
On one hand, similar to (2.9), by the reverse Hölder's inequality [15], (2.3) and the conditions, in view of q < 0, we have
Similarly, we get (3.12). Applying the reverse Hölder's inequality [15] gives
By (3.12), (3.10) is valid. On the other hand, suppose that (3.10) is valid. Let
applying (3.10) gives
By (3.16) and the conditions, it follows that . If , then (3.12) is naturally valid. If , in view of the conditions of (3.10), then (3.18) takes the strict inequality, and
In view of q < 0, hence (3.12) is valid, which is equivalent to (3.10). Thus (3.10), (3.11) and (3.12) are equivalent to each other.
For any 0 <ε <p(λ1 + β), suppose that and . Assuming there exists a positive number K with , such that (3.10) is still valid by changing to K. In particular, on one hand,
On the other hand,
By (3.19) and (3.20), it may be shown that
Let ε → 0+, then . Hence is the best constant factor of (3.10). It is obviously that the constant factor in (3.11) (or (3.12)) is the best possible. Otherwise, by (3.14) (or (3.17)), we may get a contradiction that the constant factor in (3.10) is not the best possible. This completes the proof.
THEOREM 3.3. If 0 <q < 1, , a n ≥ 0, f(x) ≥ 0 such thatand, then the following inequalities hold and are equivalent (Let I, J, L be as in Theorem 3.1):
where the constant factor are the best possible.
Proof In view of p < 0, the proof can be completed by following the same steps as in the proof of Theorem 3.2, thus we omit the details.
Remark 2. (1) In particular, if β = 0, 0 <λ1 <α, λ2 ≤ 1, λ1 + λ2 = α, then (3.1) reduces to (1.4), (3.2), and (3.3) reduce to the following inequalities respectively, which are equivalent to (1.4):
-
(2)
If α = 0, -β <λ 1 < 0, λ 2 ≤ 1 - β, λ 1 + λ 2 = -β, then (3.1)-(3.3), respectively, reduce to the following equivalent inequalities:
(3.27)(3.28)(3.29) -
(3)
If α = β, -α <λ 1 <α, λ 2 ≤ 1 - α, λ 1 + λ 2 = 0, then (3.1)-(3.3), respectively, reduce to the following equivalent inequalities:
(3.30)(3.31)(3.32)
References
Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Pólya G: Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1934.
Mitrinović DS, Pečarić JE, Fink AM: Inequalities Involving Functions and their Integrals and Derivatives. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA; 1991.
Yang B: The Norm of Operator and Hilbert-Type Inequalities. Science Press, Beijing, China; 2009.
Yang B: Discrete Hilbert-Type Inequalities. Bentham Science Publishers Ltd., Arabia Unites a Tribal Chief Country; 2011.
Brnetić I, Pečarić J: Generalization of Hilbert's integral inequality. Math Inequal Appl 2004, 7(2):199–205.
Krnić M, Pečarić J: Hilbert's inequalities and their reverses. Publ Math Debrecen 2005, 67(3–4):315–331.
Krnić M: Multidimensional Hilbert-type inequality on the weighted Orlicz spaces. Mediterr J Math 2011.
Azar L: On some extensions of Hardy-Hilbert's inequality and applications. J Inequal Appl, vol 2009, 2009: 12. Article ID 546829
Jin J, Debnath L: On a Hilbert-type linear series operator and its applications. J Math Anal Appl 2010, 371: 691–704. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.06.002
Zhong W: The Hilbert-type integral inequality with a homogeneous kernel of Lambda-degree. J Inequal Appl 2008, 2008: 13. Article ID 917392
Li Y, He B: On inequalities of Hilbert's type. Bull Aust Math Soc 2007, 76(1):1–13. 10.1017/S0004972700039423
Yang B: A mixed Hilbert-type inequality with a best constant factor. Int J Pure Appl Math 2005, 20(3):319–328.
Yang B: A half-discrete Hilbert's inequality. J Guangdong Univ Edu 2011, 31(3):1–7.
Yang B, Chen Q: A half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality with a homogeneous kernel and an extension. J Inequal Appl 2011, 2011: 21. 10.1186/1029-242X-2011-21
Kuang J: Applied Inequalities. Shangdong Science Technic Press, Jinan, China; 2004.
Acknowledgements
The study was partially supported by the Emphases Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Institution of Higher Learning, College and University (No. 05Z026).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
BH drafted the manuscript. BY conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
He, B., Yang, B. On a half-discrete inequality with a generalized homogeneous kernel. J Inequal Appl 2012, 30 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-30
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-30