- Research Article
- Open access
- Published:
Generalizations of Shafer-Fink-Type Inequalities for the Arc Sine Function
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2009, Article number: 705317 (2009)
Abstract
We give some generalizations of Shafer-Fink inequalities, and prove these inequalities by using a basic differential method and l'Hospital's rule for monotonicity.
1. Introduction
Shafer (see Mitrinovic and Vasic [1, page 247]) gives us a result as follows.
Theorem 1.1.
Let Then
The theorem is generalized by Fink [2] as follows.
Theorem 1.2.
Let Then
Furthermore, 3 and are the best constants in (1.2).
In [3], Zhu presents an upper bound for and proves the following result.
Theorem 1.3.
Let Then
Furthermore, 3 and and are the best constants in (1.3).
Malesevic [4–6] obtains the following inequality by using -method and computer separately.
Theorem 1.4.
Let Then
Zhu [7, 8] offers some new simple proofs of inequality (1.4) by L'Hospital's rule for monotonicity.
In this paper, we give some generalizations of these above results and obtain two new Shafer-Fink type double inequalities as follows.
Theorem 1.5.
Let , and . If
then
holds, where is a point in and satisfies .
Theorem 1.6.
Let and If
then
holds, where is a point in and satisfies .
3. Proofs of Theorems 1.5 and 1.6
-
(A)
We first process the proof of Theorem 1.5.
Let for , in which case the proof of Theorem 1.5 can be completed when proving that the double inequality
holds for
Let , we have
where and , , , .
Since decreases on , we obtain that decreases on by using Lemma 2.1. At the same time, , , and , .
There are four cases to consider.
Case ()
Since , decreases on , and , . So when and , (3.1) and (1.6) hold.
Case ()
At this moment, there exists a number such that , is positive on and negative on . That is, firstly increases on then decreases on , and , . So when and , (3.1) and (1.6) hold.
Case ()
Now, also firstly increases on then decreases on , and , . So when and , (3.1) and (1.6) hold too.
Case (
Since , increases on , , and . So when and , (3.1) and (1.6) hold.
-
(B)
Now we consider proving Theorem 1.6.
In view of the fact that (1.8) holds for , we suppose that in the following.
First, let and for , we have and . Second, let , then and (1.8) is equivalent to
When letting and (), (3.3) becomes (3.1).
Let . At this moment, decreases on , , , and , .
There are four cases to consider too.
Case ()
Since , decreases on , and , . If and , then (3.1) holds on and (1.8) holds.
Case (
At this moment, there exists a number such that , is positive on and negative on . That is, firstly increases on then decreases on , and , . If and , then (3.1) holds on and (1.8) holds.
Case (
Now, also firstly increases on then decreases on , and , . If and , then (3.1) holds on and (1.8) holds too.
Case (
Since , increases on , , and . If and , then (3.1) holds on and (1.8) holds.
4. The Special Cases of Theorems 1.5 and 1.6
(1)Taking in Theorem 1.5 and in Theorem 1.6 leads to the inequality (1.1).
(2)Taking in Theorem 1.5 and in Theorem 1.6 leads to the inequality (1.4).
(3)Let in Theorem 1.5 and in Theorem 1.6, we have the following result.
Theorem 4.1.
Let . Then
Furthermore, and , and are the best constants in (4.1).
References
Mitrinović DS, Vasic PM: Analytic Inequalities, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Volume 16. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 1970:xii+400.
Fink AM: Two Inequalities. Publikacije Elektrotehničkog Fakulteta Univerzitet u Beogradu. Serija Matematika 1995, 6: 48–49.
Zhu L: On Shafer-Fink inequalities. Mathematical Inequalities & Applications 2005,8(4):571–574.
Malešević BJ: One method for proving inequalities by computer. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2007, 2007:-8.
Malešević BJ: An application of -method on inequalities of Shafer-Fink's type. Mathematical Inequalities & Applications 2007,10(3):529–534.
Malešević BJ: Some improvements of one method for proving inequalities by computer. preprint, 2007, http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0701020
Zhu L: On Shafer-Fink-type inequality. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2007, 2007:-4.
Zhu L: New inequalities of Shafer-Fink type for arc hyperbolic sine. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2008, 2008:-5.
Anderson GD, Vamanamurthy MK, Vuorinen M: Inequalities for quasiconformal mappings in space. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 1993,160(1):1–18.
Anderson GD, Vamanamurthy MK, Vuorinen MK: Conformal Invariants, Inequalities, and Quasiconformal Maps, Canadian Mathematical Society Series of Monographs and Advanced Texts. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 1997:xxviii+505.
Anderson GD, Qiu S-L, Vamanamurthy MK, Vuorinen M: Generalized elliptic integrals and modular equations. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 2000,192(1):1–37. 10.2140/pjm.2000.192.1
Pinelis I: L'Hospital type results for monotonicity, with applications. Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics 2002,3(1, article 5):1–5.
Zhu L: Sharpening Jordan's inequality and the Yang Le inequality. Applied Mathematics Letters 2006,19(3):240–243. 10.1016/j.aml.2005.06.004
Niu D-W, Huo Z-H, Cao J, Qi F: A general refinement of Jordan's inequality and a refinement of L. Yang's inequality. Integral Transforms and Special Functions 2008,19(3–4):157–164.
Wu S, Debnath L: A generalization of L'Hôspital-type rules for monotonicity and its application. Applied Mathematics Letters 2009,22(2):284–290. 10.1016/j.aml.2008.06.001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Pan, W., Zhu, L. Generalizations of Shafer-Fink-Type Inequalities for the Arc Sine Function. J Inequal Appl 2009, 705317 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/705317
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/705317